The third chamber of the Superior Administrative Court (TSA) declared inadmissible another amparo action against resolution 000048, issued by Public Health on October 8, which requires the vaccination card against covid 19 to enter closed places.
The judges rejected the amparo action “because there are other judicial channels that allow obtaining the protection of the fundamental rights invoked”, by virtue of article 70, numeral 1, of law 137-11, organic of the Constitutional Court and of the constitutional procedures .
The other way that the court considers effective to challenge the resolution is the contentious-administrative appeal, which is filed before the TSA itself.
This amparo action was presented by the lawyer Manuel Santana, against the Ministry of Public Health.
Previously, that TSA chamber also declared inadmissible the amparo action filed by the lawyers Yancarlos Martínez, Eli Barbi Castro and Cirilo Guzmán, against the Presidency of the Republic, and the Ministry of Public Health, due to the existence of another effective means to attack the resolution.
The Third Chamber of the TSA is made up of judges Luisa del Carmen Canaán, president, Silvia Rosario Almonte and Jeny Rodríguez Lora.
There are now three challenges to resolution 000048 that have been rejected by the TSA.
Meanwhile, on October 28, the TSA Presidency rejected a request for a precautionary measure, which sought the provisional suspension of the regulations, which came into effect on the 18th of this month.
– .
