Russian intelligence explicitly mentioned Bulgaria as one of the incoming countries truckwhich exploded on the bridge to the Crimea.
According to Bulgarian experts, the mention of our country in connection with the logistics of the explosion of the Crimean bridge is aimed at the intervention of NATO countries in the case and in the conflict.
According to bTV sources, the cargo and the truck have separate travel routes.
The cargo is believed to have passed through Bulgaria, Georgia, crossed the border into Armenia and eventually reached the city of Armavir. Two things happened there. First, a detonation remote control was added to the payload. Second: the cargo was taken by Mahir Yusubov. He probably he had no idea what he was driving. He took the load and went to the bridge, spending the night in a shooting range parking lot. He climbed the bridge early in the morning.
The man is dead, but his relatives are still looking for him and do not believe it.
“As for the Bulgarian connection, this is one of the working versions. It is clear that Bulgaria has nothing to do with the terrorist act, rather it was used as a transit country for the explosion,” said the journalist. Fyodor Gladkikh.
Bulgaria was already explicitly mentioned by the Russian services yesterday.
“We have already established the path of movement of the exploded truck: they are Bulgaria, Georgia, Armenia, North Ossetia, Krasnodar region,” said the chairman of the Russian Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin.
A Kremlin blamed Ukraine for the explosion.
“There is no doubt that this is an act of terrorism aimed at destroying Russia’s basic civilian infrastructure. And that it was invented, built and ordered by the Ukrainian special services,” said Russian President Vladimir Putin.
According to Bulgarian military experts, our country’s intervention has other objectives.
“I absolutely exclude any Bulgarian connection to the incident. Bulgaria is mentioned again to show that NATO is waging war on Russia. I categorically exclude the possibility of Russia attacking NATO countries, but I do not rule out a hybrid impact,” he said. military expert Yordan Bozhilov said.
“There are other strange things – say Bulgaria, Georgia, you can only go by ferry, Armenia, which is in another direction. The Kremlin wants to name a NATO country and chooses one that is a weak link. If there is one. an option for a military strike, I don’t think. As long as we are acting as NATO allies, there is no danger, “said military expert and former defense minister Todor Tagarev.
The blown up bridge to Crimea is important from the standpoint of supplying the Russian army, experts add.
