The news about new Western military aid packages for Ukraine have not gone down well with military experts and analysts in Russiawho are now demanding an immediate reaction, writes b92.
“What the West is doing with the delivery of Ukraine is presumptuous. They im send more and more powerful weapons because there was no retaliation from Russia“, propagandist Igor Shishkin commented on state television, journalist Julia Davis wrote on Twitter.
Russian pundits brainstormed how to deter the West from continuing to support Ukraine. One proposed terrorist acts, another one angrily condemned his idea. Just when you thought he has a conscience, he clarified that he favored a nuclear strike instead.https://t.co/TqO0kWKPbg
— Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) May 22, 2023
“The only things that work are force and fear. They won’t stop until they feel fear. So we have two options: Successfully complete a special military operation, but if for some reason we are unable to do so, then we must cause them losses. If France supplies weapons to kill Russians, then there must be blood in the streets of France. If Germany sends tanks to kill Russian soldiers, then blood must flow in the streets of Germany“, Shishkin said, and pointed out that “proxies” should be used for these attacks.
That is, terrorists who would carry out these attacks in the name of Russia. The analyst and writer Dmitry Lekukh opposed Shishkin’s idea.
“If we do what Shishkin suggests, we will not attack the elites. If we become a terrorist state, it will be bad for us, not for them. If we had decided so, I’d rather nuke London,” he said angrily.
Medvedev: Arms deliveries to Ukraine make nuclear apocalypse more likely
NATO does not take the possibility of nuclear conflict seriously
2023-05-23 16:10:36
#Russian #state #television #offer #nuclear #bombs #Western #cities