Home » today » Sport » Barracas Central, the new Arsenal?

Barracas Central, the new Arsenal?

In the times of Julio Grondona, all eyes were on Sarandí. For the opinion of the rostrum, Arsenal ran with the Commissioner’s Horse. Suspicions were superfluous and the referees directed conditions. Today it happens with Central Tents, the team of Claudio Tapia, head of the AFA, and his two sons: Matías -the president- and Iván -midfielder-.

This Saturday, a goal from Handsome In the fifth additional minute it generated the explosion of Ricardo Caruso Lombardi, DT of Belgrano, who had reached that stage with two less players. Federico Beligoy, Director of Arbitration Training, crossed it on social networks. Far from lowering the foam, thick ammunition was fired from Córdoba in different media. Simultaneously, the porteño club accused the celestial ones for destruction in the visiting dressing room after the game.

“Last week a colleague had to endure Mr. Zubeldia’s outbursts and today the same thing happened with Mr. Caruso Lombardi. Argentine Referees are no longer going to allow these cowardly acts. Mandatory compliance with the regulatory appendix “Beligoy posted on his Twitter account.


The Lanús coach had pointed out Ariel Penel as “Fan of Boca” and “thief” after the game his team lost to Newell’s. Caruso this Saturday went over to Rubén Bustos, assistant number 1, who marked the Barracas attack when Nicolas Trecco scored the winning goal. But, according to the coach himself, he did not insult him. “I claimed the offside,” he said. The head judge, Nelson Sosa, fired him.

The DT emphasized on TN: “Beligoy goes out to say that Caruso did like Zubeldia and not. I did not have any violent statements. What I do mean, when the mess broke out, I told the referees that it was their fault they were beating my players. And the lineman (sic) told me it was my fault. ‘It is your fault that you are a disaster directing’, I told. Then the line started attacking me. He told me he was a cagón, to hit him. It’s not logical, guys. I get hot for it. That in the report does not put it. And I went crazy when he said that I spit it out. How are you going to say that? I haven’t slept in six hours. A stitch caught me in the head and I thought I was dying. “

Caruso lunged against Tapia and Pablo Toviggino, Executive Secretary of the Presidency of the AFA: “There are technicians who call me desperate, who do not want to go to direct parties because they know they are going to screw them up. What happens is that Beligoy works for Toviggino and Tapia. Let him grab the referee. Why doesn’t Beligoy count Riestra’s party? ”. The reference has to do with the non-existent criminal that Luis Lobo Medina he charged in favor of Riestra against Atlético Rafaela on the first date, and that gave the tie to the team managed by Víctor Stinfale.

Barracas Central issued a statement accompanied by photos and videos in which faucets could be seen lying on the floor, doors and broken toilets. The club pointed out to Caruso: “Since his arrival at the stadium, he continued with provocations of various kinds, unfounded threats and continuous disrespect, which culminated in the incidents that occurred at the end of the match and on the field against the staff of our institution” .

He also clarified that he will file a claim with the AFA for the “vandalism” of the visiting wardrobe. Instead, he did not explain what so many people were doing on the platform.

Sweepers. What were these men doing on the court? Caruso says they belong to the Barracas bar.


“At 49 minutes, when he kicks me out, he tells me it was ‘for talking to the audience.’ I was leaving the court and he let the game continue, he didn’t even let me go out. And when the incidents occurred, I was up my sleeve. Do you know what happened? Seven people entered disguised as street sweepers. All those who are in green are from the fans. They were the ones who hit the players ”, denounced Caruso, hot.

Pablo Vegetti, forward of the Cordovan club, wrote on Instagram: “The game ended and we found that they show the tumult (we defended ourselves from people who entered from outside to attack us, thank goodness that because of Covid 19 the games are without public), they also show the ‘destruction’ of a changing room WHICH DID NOT HAPPEN (but they do not show that we left the stadium without bathing and guarded by the Police as if we had done something wrong). What happened the 90 minutes did someone show it? If you speak, you are a crybaby and you show what you want, here is the law ”. And he dedicated a quote to Maradona: “Diego, today the ball got stained.”

Uncontrolled.  Caruso yelled at Bustos, the assistant.  He claimed offside in the goal of Barracas.

Uncontrolled. Caruso yelled at Bustos, the assistant. He claimed offside in the goal of Barracas.


The president of Belgrano, Jorge Franceschi, said in the program AscensoX3: “The lives of the players were in danger under the watchful eye of the president and vice president of Barracas and the President of the AFA.” Will he have regretted accompanying the Executive Committee’s decision to end the season and build a new championship?

Later, he issued a statement in which he remarked that all security protocols were violated. He accompanied it with videos.

“It was very visible that there were many more people than allowed in the stands and in breach of social distancing. And around 20 people on the field of play by authorization of the arbitration triad, justifying that they were doing maintenance tasks and opening the exit sleeve This is in violation of the match protocol that orders a maximum of 4. That is, everything was planned as a liberated zone in favor of the local team, “reads the letter from the Cordovan club.

Was Barracas’s goal legitimate? With the only available camera it is difficult to determine. The restrictions of the Buenos Aires government, which do not allow television channels to install a mangrullo to be able to equip transmissions with more technology, prevented an image from the side.

The expulsions of Joaquin Novillo -the second yellow was a foul on Iván Tapia- and Franco Negri -the assistant denounced that he insulted him- they were much discussed by all the Belgrano players.

The arbitrations are under the magnifying glass in the First National. Do they direct conditioned? Every week there are controversies and many question the “Friends of the mother house” from Viamonte street in a championship stained by controversy.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.