The new guidelines on pharmacological abortion that canceled the hospitalization obligation for taking the Ru486 pill, according to the newspaper Future, violate the Constitution. The newspaper of the Episcopal Conference writes it on the front page of today’s edition (Sunday 23). Since “the advisory network was born with the exact opposite purpose: to provide an alternative to women who think they are forced by the most varied circumstances to turn off the life of their child in the womb”, he writes Future, involving family counseling in the abortion practice alters the regulations in force “with a simple circular – as do the new guidelines of the Ministry of Health governing the use of the abortion pill – and not through a parliamentary amendment of the law in force”. And this “would lead to a violation of the Constitution”.
–
The role of the consultors
In an analysis entitled “Consultors and women, the law speaks clearly”, the daily newspaper of the bishops underlines today that “the ministerial decision to involve family consultants in the practice of abortion continues to cause perplexity”. «The counseling network was born with the exact opposite purpose: to provide an alternative to women who think they are forced by the most varied circumstances to turn off the life of their child in the womb – he explains -. This is what emerges from the law 405 of 1975, which established the consultors ». Second Future, “Its perspective is clear from article 1, which among the aims of these structures indicates” the protection of the health of the woman and the product of conception “. “Attention – continues the CEI newspaper -: in all 8 articles that make up the text, the termination of pregnancy is never foreseen: we only talk about contraception”. «It is true – she continues -: the first law that allowed, in a limited number of cases (at least formally), the voluntary interruption of pregnancy is the 194 of 1978, therefore passed 3 years after the one that established the counseling centers. But it is equally undeniable that even this second norm did not intend to ask for the collaboration of these structures for the killing of the child in the womb of the pregnant woman. Rather”. “Family counseling centers – reads article 2 – assist pregnant women (…) helping to overcome the causes that could lead the woman to terminate the pregnancy”.
–
“We needed a law”
“Just to achieve this goal – he explains again Future – the law states that the same structures “can make use (…) of the voluntary collaboration of suitable basic social training and voluntary associations, which can also help difficult maternity after birth”. “The practical objective seems very clear – he adds -: since the economic resources, even then, were not enough to remove the problems faced by pregnant women, there was and is given the possibility that the clinics make use of the great voluntary service network, like the large and generous one that animates the Life Aid Centers ». “To dispel any doubt about the purposes of these structures – writes the Catholic daily -, article 5 of the same law 194/78 provides that when they are faced with a woman who asks for the voluntary interruption of the pregnancy, the task in any case (…) of examining with the woman and with the father of the conceived, where the woman allows it (…) to help her to remove the causes that would lead to the termination of pregnancy ‘”. Likewise, “if a woman goes to her doctor, he should inform her Future, “The law forbade and prohibits the clinic from doing it on its own: abortion, in fact, can only be carried out by a (different) authorized facility. Altering this discipline with a simple circular – as do the new guidelines of the Ministry of Health that govern the use of the abortion pill – and not through a parliamentary amendment of the law in force, would give rise to a violation of the Constitution ”.
–
–
23 August 2020 (change 23 August 2020 | 11:32)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED
– .
