Home » today » News » The good performance of Hillal FC is not rewarded

The good performance of Hillal FC is not rewarded

The top division of the football district loses the first match after promotion. The SC Opel Rüsselsheim soon opens the way to victory.

Hillal Rüsselsheim’s Oberliga players (Mohamed Jemi behind) lost early to Olympia Biebesheim (Lars Schneidler on the ball). Photo: André Dziemballa

RUSELSHEIM – Ruesselsheim. After a 2-1 defeat to SC Opel Rüsselsheim, TSV Goddelau remained without points in the second game of the new season in the Darmstadt / Groß-Gerau district football championship. FC Hillal and FC Türk Gücü Rüsselsheim suffered narrow losses despite good performances.

FV Hellas Ruesselsheim TSV Wolfskehlen 4: 1 (3: 1). The Rüsselsheimer showed a good performance despite seven missing players and also gained the three points of height. The hosts improved tactically and showed a disciplined match in 90 minutes, while Wolfskehlen never entered the game. “Our players did well, we didn’t expect to win,” praised his team Alexander Stumm, sporting director of FV Hellas. In the second period Wolfskehlen increased the offensive, but was no longer able to endanger the victory of Rüsselsheim.

Injustice: 1: 0 Okcuer (9.), 1: 1 Riesle (12.), 2: 1 Bozkurt (38.), 3: 1 Koc (45. + 1), 4: 1 Trbojevic (90.).

TSV Goddelau SC Opel Ruesselsheim 1: 2 (0: 2). Even in the second home game after the rebirth, TSV Goddelau’s great fight was not rewarded. Although coach Uli Höllenriegel’s team once again had more possession of the ball, they failed to score. For the newborn Rüsselsheim these were the first points. Moritz Jansen led the way early with the goal after two minutes. Goddelau does not give up, but it is unfortunate that goalkeeper Cem Tonguc has to be replaced.

Injustice: 0: 1 Jansen (2.), 0: 2 Jansen (38.), 1: 2 Hirsch (80.).

FC Hillal Ruesselsheim SV Olympia Biebesheim 3: 4 (2: 1). Despite a good performance, the promoted FC Hillal learned the hard way on the first day of play. “We have conceded three goals from set pieces,” said player-manager Said Belhadj. The guests appeared to be in good shape. In the second half, the Rüsselsheimers failed mainly due to the moderate transformation of chances, as the player-manager explained: “We have to score five goals in the second half.” It was annoying for the promoted side that the favorite’s winning goal only came in the eighth minute of injury time.

Injustice: 1: 0 Azzakriti (6 °), 1: 1 Cutrone (8 °), 2: 1 Robin Frisch (31 ° / Eigentor), 2: 2 Michel (69 ° / Foulelfmeter), 2: 3 Kabey (82 °), 3: 3 Jamie (83 ° / Fourth), 3: 4 Robin Frisch (90 ° + 8).

Spvgg. Seeheim-Jugenheim Türk Gücü Rüsselsheim 2: 1 (0: 1). In the first half of the first 45 minutes, the Rüsselsheimers were the better team and deservedly led before the hosts got into the game better. The match is decided with a double strike immediately after the interval. After the Spvgg. missed his third goal, Türk Gücü was once again the best eleven in the finals. “The victory is not undeserved, but Rüsselsheim would have deserved a point,” admitted Peter Polak, the winner’s sporting director. Despite the defeat, the newly formed team around player-manager Pierre Penz showed a good performance.

Injustice: 0: 1 Auadi (20.), 1: 1 Wanitschek (47.), 2: 1 Gros (50.).

Stenogram

RW Darmstadt II Germany Eberstadt 3: 3 (2: 3). Goals: 0: 1 Sparviero (13 °), 0: 2 Mangold (24 ° / penalty), 1: 2 Wembacher (28 °), 1: 3 Sparviero (31 °), 2: 3 Hornung (39 °) , 3: 3 Hornung (83).

SV Hahn SKG Bickenbach 0: 1 (0: 1). Tor: 0: 1 Anding (40.).

STG Messel SG mode 0: 1 (0: 1). Tor: 0: 1 Becker (16.).}

SV Traisa SG Arheilgen 3: 1 (1: 1). Goals: 1: 0 Umoru (14th), 1: 1 Mohr (39th), 2: 1 Umoru (57th), 3: 1 Pohl (63rd) Special incident: Wüst (Traisa) saves a penalty Nischwitz (52.).

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.