Rep. Jang said on his Facebook page that afternoon, “I speak to a civic group that made criminal charges against the perpetrators against my will.” I express my great regret for proceeding with criminal prosecution against the perpetrator, unilaterally ignoring my intentions without any communication with me, even though I have clearly stated that I want to.”
Earlier on the morning of the morning, the NGO Active Bindan accused former CEO Kim of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo Police Station on charges of forced harassment. Since sexual crime is not a parental offense, an investigation can be initiated even if there is an accusation from a third party other than the victim.
In a complaint, Hong Jeong-sik, head of the active bindan, said, “Not only the party members, but the whole people were shocked and shocked by the unprecedented ugliness of the public party representative in the history of the political party.” He said, “You have to get the judgment of the law.”
-Rep. Jang complained, “As a victim, it is very unfair to put me in an endless case of damage, regardless of my willingness to recover my daily life in the way I want it to be.” What I decide not to do is not for the perpetrator, but for myself. It has already been clarified that the perpetrator’s poet and the public party’s procedure was the cause of sexual harassment. Should I bear the abuse?” he asked.
He said, “The actions of the civic groups are not helping to return to my daily life, but rather a rash action that hinders me.” The purpose of the revised sex offenses from paternal confession is to respect the victim’s will and extend the rights I am not saying that I should ignore them.”
Rep. Jang said, “I want to return to my daily life in the way I want, without being trapped by any victimization. And I hope that the person who will speak next time can speak more comfortably.”
The day before, former CEO Kim resigned from the party’s post, acknowledging that he had sexually harassed Rep. Jang.
Kim Jin-ha, reporter of Donga.com [email protected]
| Representative Jang Hye-won, full text on Facebook |
| Let me be clear. The most important thing in the process of responding to a sexual assault case is for the victim to get back to life. Solidarity with the victim, approaching from the victim’s point of view, and not compelling’victimity’ are not abstract concepts, but very specific methodologies. It is that we respect the victim’s wishes first and foremost in the way we raise the issue, solve it, and close it. In that sense, I would like to speak to a civic group that made criminal charges against the perpetrator against my will. In light of the general principle of dealing with sexual violence that prioritizes the victim’s daily recovery, the victim was a criminal against the perpetrator, unilaterally ignoring my intentions without any communication with me, even though I clearly expressed my willingness for a community solution. We are very sorry for proceeding with the accusation. As a victim of damage, it is very unreasonable to put me in an endless incident regardless of my willingness, struggling to restore my daily life the way I want. The decision not to proceed with the complaint through the judicial system is not for the perpetrator, but for myself. It has already been clarified that the perpetrator’s poet and public party proceedings have made it clear that what I have experienced is sexual harassment. Furthermore, the process of asking for community responsibility and further social responsibility for this is widely underway. This process alone is already causing unreasonable secondary harassment. Why am I already suffering from such unfair secondary harassment, through an unwanted third party’s accusation, to recall and explain the damage again, and endure the secondary harassment that will inevitably accompany the process? The actions of the civic groups do not help me return to my daily life, but rather hinder me. The purpose of revising sex offenses from intimacy to non-confidential is to respect the will of the victim and extend their rights, not to ignore the will of the victim. Criminal complaints are one of the ways victims find their rights. Misleading judicial treatment as if it were the victim’s duty is just another force of victimhood. While speaking of victim-centeredness by mouth, in reality, I feel very irritated by all manner of consuming sexual assault incidents without sympathizing with the victim’s pain at all. I feel that the fight against sexual violence is a fight against perpetrators, a fight against perpetrator-centredism, and a fight against the damn practice of consuming sexual violence as a primary source of news instead of using it as an opportunity for community reflection. There are two reasons for writing this article. I want to return to my daily routine the way I want, without being trapped by any victimization. And I hope that the person who will speak next time can speak more comfortably. I don’t think you want too much. I believe our society can be a better society than this. |
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
—
–
