Doctors confirm vaccination damage in 37-year-olds
Instead of Rhodes, where Sebastian Schönert wanted to spend his holidays after being vaccinated against the coronavirus, the young man ended up in the acute stroke ward of the University Hospital of Cologne. After his release, he cannot work for weeks. Due to the risk of another vascular occlusion, he also had to undergo blood tests for months and also take medications that thin his blood.
–
According to the 37-year-old, his life is still burdened today. Both the University Hospital of Cologne and the University of Greifswald, which examined his blood, certify that he suffered the rare vaccine injury, sinus vein thrombosis, as a result of the vaccination. According to the attorney of the Wiesbaden actor, Joachim Caesar-Preller, the burden of the testimony of medical reports is extremely clear in this case. This makes it so unique, because hardly anyone else has this medical data.
–
The manufacturer Astrazeneca refuses compensation
Despite medical reports, the manufacturer rejects an out-of-court settlement. In a letter available to the MDR, the group emphasizes the “positive risk-benefit balance” of its Vaxzevria vaccine. The “very low” risk of suffering from sinus vein thrombosis with thrombocytopenia was already known at the time of vaccination and was part of the product information. Therefore, one is not obliged to pay compensation even if such a rare risk “unfortunately materializes” in individual cases.
–
Lawyer: The proceedings are unnecessarily prolonged
With the refusal of an out-of-court payment, Sebastian Schönert was forced to sue the manufacturer. Not having legal protection insurance, he had to pay upfront with his savings of around € 8,000. According to the young man, the risk in fighting a powerful pharmaceutical company with large financial resources would lie entirely with him. If he loses the trial, he has to pay all court and legal fees. The lawsuit was filed in March by Wiesbaden lawyer Joachim Caesar-Preller. However, the proceedings dragged on in vain and it would have taken months for the other party to respond to the complaint.
–
–
