Britney Spears Posts on ‘Revenge’ in First Instagram Since Daddy Jamie Calls for End of Guardianship After 13 Years

BRITNEY Spears posted an article about ‘revenge’ on her first Instagram after her father Jamie Spears asked to end his guardianship.

Jamie has had legal control over his daughter for 13 years.

Britney posted about ‘revenge’ in a new Instagram[/caption]

This is the first post she has shared since Jamie filed documents to end the guardianship[/caption]

He filed the papers on Tuesday[/caption]

Just hours after Jamie filed papers to end guardianship on Tuesday, Britney take from Instagram to share two back photos of her on stage with Iggy Azalée, 31.

Next to the photos, the 39-year-old man wrote: “Me and Iggy on stage !!!

“It was so much fun working with such a tough and badass woman like her…. I haven’t met her new baby but if she reads this god bless you and thank you for all your kind words !!!!”

She concluded, “Pssss although the name of the song is Pretty Girls, I think the concept is more like NERDS revenge. !!!!”

The Toxic singer was also interested in her Instagram story to show off her yellow dress.

While modeling the summer dress in two clips, the text on the screen read: “Here is me in my yellow dress !!!! “

BRITNEY’S ALMOST FREE

Britney shared the posts soon after Jamie filed papers to end the guardianship.

The documents say the 39-year-old singer “has the right to ask this court to seriously consider whether this guardianship is no longer necessary.”

In addition, the filing of claims BritneyThe circumstances of s have changed “to such an extent that the grounds for establishing a guardianship may no longer exist”.

“As Mr. Spears has said over and over again, all he wants is what’s best for his daughter,” the document reads.

“If Ms. Spears wants to end the guardianship and thinks she can manage her own life, Mr. Spears thinks she should be given that chance. “

Judge Brenda Penny, who is overseeing the case, will have to approve the move.

A request from Britney Spears’ attorney to dismiss him was due to be heard at the next hearing in the case on September 29.

Britney’s attorney, Mathew Rosengart, told The Sun of Jamie’s petition: “It appears Mr. Spears thinks he can try to avoid liability and justice, including by appearing for a deposition under the law. oath and responding to other findings under oath, but as we assess his case – which was inappropriately sent to the media before being served on a lawyer – we will also continue to explore all options. “

In a second statement, the lawyer said: “This filing represents a massive legal victory for Britney Spears, as well as a justification.

“After exposing his misconduct and his inappropriate plan to hold his daughter hostage in trying to secure a multi-million dollar settlement, Mr. Spears has now effectively surrendered. There is no regulation.

The lawyer then shared his plans to continue his “investigation into financial mismanagement and other issues.”

JAMIES ASKS $ 2 MILLION

Jamie’s deposit arrived a week later Britney slammed her father for trying to ‘extort’ $ 2 million from him in exchange for his resignation as curator.

The explosive court documents from the pop star’s lawyer called Patriarch Spears “shameful” for allegedly trying to get more money from his daughter on top of the “millions” he has already received.

In court documents obtained by The Sun, Britney’s attorney wrote a scathing message for Jamie and his attorney.

“Although Mr. Spears has clearly been engaged in abusive and intimidating behavior for over a decade while elevating his own personal and financial interests above those of his daughter,” the petition began.

He continued: “Regardless of the past, Mr. Spears and his council are now forewarned: the status quo is no longer tolerable, and Britney Spears will not be extorted.

” Sir. Spears ‘blatant attempt to trade the suspension and revocation in exchange for roughly $ 2 million in payments, on top of the millions already raised from Ms Spears’ estate by Mr Spears and his associates, has failed.

Mathew also alleged that Jamie was attempting “to secure payments to certain third parties when he perceives he still has leverage to secure concessions, but the reasons for his daring desire to divert assets from guardianship for him- even and for others are, for the moment, irrelevant. ”

JAMIE DESCEND

In August, Jamie revealed his intention to withdraw as Britney’s curator in court documents.

Court documents filed by JamieThe lawyer states: “There is, in fact, no real reason to suspend or revoke Mr. Spears as registrar of the estate.

“And it is highly questionable that a change in restaurateur at this time would be in Ms. Spears’ best interest. “

The docs – first obtained by TMZ – continue: “Nonetheless, even though Mr. Spears is the constant target of unwarranted attacks, he does not think that a public battle with his daughter over his continued service as a Tory would be in his best interest.

“So even though he has to challenge this unwarranted petition for his dismissal, Mr. Spears intends to work with the court and his daughter’s new lawyer to prepare for an orderly transition to a new Tory.” “

‘SHAMEFUL’

In response to Jamie’s petition to resign under certain conditions, Matthew called the Tory “shameful” and claimed that he “spent the overwhelming majority of his brief engaging in inappropriate attacks and pointing fingers” .

“Trying to defend himself, he also looks back for 13 years, inappropriately discussing his daughter’s ‘mental health issues’ while outrageously suggesting that he should be ‘thanked’,” the expert said angrily. legal.

BRITNEY’S CONSERVATORSHIP

The Womanizer singer was first placed under guardianship in 2008 following a public outage, as she fought to have her father removed as a curator in court.

Britney has already done a number of shocking claims about the Conservatory during court appearances.

She once said she wanted to have another baby and get married – but asserted that her “curator will not let her.” “

Britney too alleged his family ‘lived’ off their $ 60 million fortune for 13 years and that she was “Forced to take lithium” as “punishment”.

Besides, pop star compared ‘abusive’ conservation to sex trafficking.

Jamie has had legal control over the singer for 13 years[/caption]

She has made shocking statements about her family in recent court appearances[/caption]