The monster he was concerned about was born.

②“If the nuclear power plant investigation, the airlift takes it… ”

– There is a big difference between the Roh Moo-Hyun administration’s airlift and the Moon Jae-in government’s airlift in relation to other organizations. The Roh Moo-hyun administration’s Airlift Law says that’the National Assembly, the auditor, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, and the Ministry of National Defense may request an investigation with the airlift in cases where the investigation is considered significant. This is a form in which another agency requests the airlift to investigate the case.

On the other hand, the Moon Jae-in government’s law on airlift includes a clause that states,’If (the head of the airlift) determines that it is appropriate to conduct an investigation and requests a transfer, the relevant investigating agency must comply with it.’ For example, while the prosecution is investigating a crime of a high-ranking public official, if the head of the public prosecutor asks for a surrender, the prosecution must hand over all the investigation data to the air defense department and remove his hand.

Young-soo Jang, a professor at the Graduate School of Law at Korea University, said, “Because of the agency’s right to request an espionage, the agency is viewed as a higher level agency of other investigative agencies.” He said, “There is no way to do anything that is unfavorable to the regime, such as the suspicion of intervention in the Ulsan mayoral election or the shutdown of the Wolseong Unit 1 nuclear power plant.

–

On April 29, 2019, Lee Sang-min, chairman of the Special Committee on Judicial Reform, introduced bills such as the High-ranking Officials Crime Investigation Office (KAI) bill and the reconciliation bill for the prosecutor’s investigation right at the Plenary Meeting of the Special Committee of Culture, Sports and Tourism in Yeouido, Seoul. And is tapping the gavel. [김경록 기자]

– The Roh Moo-hyun administration’s law of airlift was sent to the prosecution to be terminated even if a case requested by another agency was concluded to be innocent as a result of an investigation into the airlifter. The reason was explained as’allowing the prosecution to perform the control function of the airlift.’ The Moon Jae-in government’s airlift has no way to check the case even if it unfairly closes the case.

③ Even if the opposition party opposes, the chief of staff can be appointed

– In the Roh Moo-hyun administration’s Airlift Act,’the Dean is appointed by the President at the request of the Chairman of the National Integrity Committee after a resolution by the National Integrity Committee (currently the National Rights Committee).’ The integrity committee consists of 9 members. Among the members, three are appointed by the President, three are nominated by the National Assembly, and three are nominated by the President of the Supreme Court. The reason for the decision to go through the Integrity Committee was that the airlift was supposed to belong to the Integrity Committee. At the time, there were criticisms that the method of appointing the head of the airlift undermined neutrality.

The Democratic Party, which was pushing for legislation in the 20th National Assembly, emphasized the opposition party’s veto power and insisted that it could secure the neutrality of the airborne chief. At a meeting of the National Assembly’s Special Committee on Judicial Reform in June of last year, Democratic Party lawmaker Park Ju-min said, “The Minister of Public Service can make a candidate only when four-fifths (6) of seven nominating committees approve.” They can exercise their non-total rights (right to reject).”

–

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae leaves at a plenary meeting held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the afternoon of the 10th, after some amendments to the establishment and operation of a high-ranking public officials criminal investigation office (airport office) have been passed, and is greeting with Kim Jin-ae, the president of the Open Democratic Party. According to the changed law, two candidates may be selected with the approval of at least two-thirds of the members of the Candidate Recommendation Committee for the Minister of Public Transport. [연합뉴스]

– In fact, under the Airborne Ministry Act, which took effect in July, the Committee for Recommendation of Candidate for the Minister of Airlift is composed of a total of 7 people, including 2 people recommended by the ruling party and 2 people recommended by the opposition party. The President appoints one of them as the head of the airlift. If two opposition nominating committee members exercised their veto, a specific person could not be recommended as a candidate. However, on the 10th, the Democratic Party revised the Airlift Act and changed the requirements for nomination of candidates for the Airborne Minister, which had been ‘6 or more members’, to’more than two-thirds of the current members’. Even if two opposition nominating committee members refused, it became possible to recommend the head of the airlift.

Reporter Yoon Seongmin [email protected]



–

Related posts:

Improving Mobility for People with Disabilities: An Interview with Delphine Labbé and Krista Best

Hérault Numérique: Free offers are available

"New York MLS Coach Gerhard Struber Fired After Poor Start and Racism Controversy"

Black Lives Matter: Donald Trump criticizes planned action in New York - politics

Share this:

• Facebook
• X

Related