Home » today » World » The EU has frozen the visa facilitation arrangement with Russia: what will materialize, there is no consequence? – September 2, 2022

The EU has frozen the visa facilitation arrangement with Russia: what will materialize, there is no consequence? – September 2, 2022

An additional misanthropic news has arrived: the EU has determined to freeze the visa facilitation settlement with Russia.

In accordance to the EU’s head of diplomacy, Josep Borrell, given that mid-July the European Union has observed a critical influx of Russian citizens to neighboring nations, which “threatens the protection of these states”.

Accurate, EU associates bordering Russia can nevertheless control the matter on their personal, and Estonia has already desired to stop allowing Russians to pass with any Schengen visas, though Finland, on the opposite, does not look at them a “safety threatens” and opposed entry bans with Schengen visas already issued.

But in common, the vector of the evolution of Russian-European relations is clear: the building of the “Iron Curtain”, and this time – mostly by the forces of Europe, not Eurasia.

The EU carries on to pit Europeans in opposition to Russians as “individuals”, that is, as men and women with a sure “nationwide home allow”. And the citizens of the Russian Federation continue to incite against the West and to “automatically” acquire around the Kremlin.

All sanctions steps, especially those relating to people indiscriminately, relatively than separately, are ways in the direction of a world escalation of mutual grievance, irritation and hatred, with unpredictable effects. Or relatively, alas, with the predictable …

***

They say that when God would like to punish, He usually takes the mind off. For some time now it seems significantly distinct to me that in the age of the Web, not person people today by itself, but humanity as a form of world total is turning into much more nervous and silly (I wrote a book about this, which has been revealed this 12 months).

The period of the net, which gave increase to the influence of “omniscience”, when individuals started to think that a certain “earthly reserve of future” experienced appeared, in which, as in the divine, “every little thing about everybody is written “grew to become yet another obstacle to the Lord. But in reality – a problem for the folks them selves, who ultimately plunged into each individual other’s dread and horror and cried out in refrain of “safety”.

And the states are there: “Who shouted for protection? Now we will organize it for you in no time! To start with of all, we will reveal the “world wide risk”, and then we will commence an uncompromising war with it until finally comprehensive victory! “I have now talked about it in additional detail, so I will let the” non-mortal “sin to quotation by themselves:

“The excellent politics, and previously mentioned all the western a single, has been residing for some time according to the legal guidelines of the“ excellent clamor of the net ”. That is, it follows the instance of modern society, which has turned into a childish and hysterical on-line crowd, declaring alone in a “daily plebiscite” manner. Of course, Ernest Renan, the founder of modern day civil-national idea, spoke of the everyday plebiscite as the invisible foundation of a civilized country at the close of the 19th century.

But, of training course, he did not have – and could not have – in head that kind of this “plebiscite” that experienced been recognized in the age of the web, completely mindless and oversaturated with unfavorable emotions that multiplied kaleidoscopically.

What is taking place now in the earth, in reality, is nothing at all far more than a consequence of the consolidated “religion of protection”. Speech on safe and sound room (safespace in English suggests “protected house”), which arose between the 20th and 21st hundreds of years. in the American university atmosphere, it immediately broke by way of and captured the world wide political area, firmly entering the global Orwellian chronicle and becoming an productive software for Realpolitik.

As a outcome, the full world, and over all, the powers that “govern planet procedures” have rushed to the battle for a “single and indivisible protected space” – of program, for themselves and “their” areas. At the identical time, contrary to all previous eras, the major objective this time was not the safety of these sovereign areas from intense assaults from the outside the house that have currently occurred, but their world wide avoidance. That is, their complete and, most importantly, early avoidance. In effect, all this has turned into an aggressive and deeply provocative political stress (ie specifically opposed to the declared “stability target”) and a strong reciprocal political stress on a variety of sovereign-civilized spaces “.

And the problem occurs: right after the place-safe-Armageddon, to which the planet is pushed by all the new tries of diverse civilizations to “cancel” every single other, who will rejoice the rubble of the universe?

Men and women? States? Or vultures and crows? ..

***

And an additional question, “afterwards”: why, when the United States invaded Iraq (and for this motive France and Germany even criticized them) and in the conclusion provoked a “war of all from all” in the Middle East, Has the EU not imposed any sanctions on the United States and American citizens? Haven’t you even tried using to go over this matter on this sort of a plane? And nevertheless number of people in Europe check with this exciting question. How occur? Why are distinct nations various varieties? Perfectly, that’s what they would say in the very clear. And they would realize that these a division eventually ranks absolutely everyone in accordance to the “nuclear position”. With all the consequent …

However, Europeans communicate about it. But not by means of the mouth of experts, but politicians, and not “with their heads held significant”, but courteous and educational. For illustration, as does a well-recognised professional in separatist conflicts in Europe and outside of – Honorary Professor of Political Science at the Cost-free College of Brussels Bruno Coppieters.

In point, it directly admits that the perspective of the European Union in the encounter of this or that separatist conflict relies upon mainly not on legal arguments and criteria, but on Realpolitik, that is, on the extent to which this conflict influences the EU: “The variation amongst the separatist conflicts that just take put at the coronary heart of the European integration process and those people that choose location on the “periphery”. And because the EU have to be observed as the main European framework, the difference will have to be made in terms of the separation of processes having position inside of and outside the house the EU. Or, to be a lot more unique, concerning divided states that are or have a real prospect of starting to be EU users – and those that are not EU customers and have no authentic prospect of signing up for the EU. “

In other words and phrases, if following some separatist conflicts in Europe it becomes “too very hot”, then you can “close your eyes” on art. 2 of the United Nations Charter, guaranteeing the “sovereign equality” and “territorial inviolability” of nations (ie the member states of the United Nations) and recognizing the unilateral secession of Slovenia and Croatia, which separated from Yugoslavia (as it did the Federal Republic of Germany in December 1991), or Kosovo, divided from Serbia (as did lots of European international locations and the United states of america, and not only, in February 2008). If a certain state, this sort of as, for example, Ukraine or Moldova, aspires to Europe and some of its locations hurry in the “reverse” (Russian) direction and in fact even turn into a self-proclaimed or “united with a other point out “formations, then their secessionism no for a longer period receives any ethical assist from the EU. If we are speaking about separatist collisions considerably from Europe, for instance in the Caucasus, the EU is simply just of very little fascination to them and the scenario is at the mercy of Realpolitik “there”.

***

Here is a wonderful “earth peace” that was founded in the 3rd 10 years of the 21st century. And like “absolutely nothing new”. Double expectations and Realpolitik ended up not born currently. Yes, only now the stage of irresponsibility of the gamers in these unsafe video games, densely laden with radioactive bells and whistles, has come dangerously near to the level of the “web plinth” …

It would seem that in the in close proximity to long run “every thing will be like this, there is no final result”, and the bifurcation place – wherever the international (or transgender?) Male, environment fire to his hut (or hut?) From 4 finishes, will have a prospect to quit and make the signal of the cross – it will not likely occur until the nuclear “thunder strikes” …

Do you agree with the creator?

Daniel Kotsjubinsky

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.