A survey conducted yesterday showed Broad support for the decision to extend to quarantine. Analía del Franco’s study detailed an accompaniment of almost 80 percent to the message of Alberto Fernández. The survey was carried out as soon as the announcement was finished, at the AMBA. “It is evident that the expectation of the announcement was high since almost 80 percent say they have seen or heard it. The reception of the announcements and their arguments was positive despite not being ‘good news’,” the survey highlights.
78, 9 of the respondents saw the ads on TV; one 16.1 stated that “they” told “something”; and the remaining 5 percent saw nothing. 76.9 percent said they agree with the tightening of the quarantine until July 17. Disagreeing, 21.9 percent expressed themselves. 1.5 does not know.
Regarding the words of Alberto Fernández, 71.6 percent liked the presidential intervention. 20.2 said they did not like it, and the remaining 8.2 said they did not know. As for the credibility of the president in his reasons for lengthening social isolation, 78.5 believed him, compared to 15.7 who did not believe him and 5.8 who said they did not know.
Finally, Respondents were asked about the degree of agreement with those who say that thanks to the quarantine effort, a situation like that experienced by Brazil and Chile was avoided.. 78.8 said they agree, while 18.3 said they disagreed and 2.9 expressed not knowing.
The survey was conducted yesterday, after the announcement, at 650 men and women of the AMBA, between 17 and 74 years old and able to vote, with a margin of error of +/- 3.8 percent. The modality was by telephone, “under the IVR system, recorded by announcer, with application of a semi-structured questionnaire designed ad-hoc, with closed questions, and opinion scales.”
It is also highlighted that “although the flash poll asked only about the credibility and acceptance of the president, the image of the three leaders together and their agreements despite the differences is a reassuring contribution to public opinion. “
– .
