The paradox is that the right-wing candidate Lozan Panov actually works for Gerdjikov (Anastas Gerdjikov – editor’s note) during this campaign. This was stated by the sociologist Parvan Simeonov from Gallup Balkan International to BNR.
“If you look at the percentages, hesitating between Radev and Gerdjikov, some right-wing voters would send Radev to a runoff,” he said.
According to him, Rumen Radev is on the verge of winning the first round and it all depends on what will happen in the last days of the campaign. For the sociologist, the fact that both the BSP and “We continue the change” compete in their support for Radev is very advantageous for the head of state.
Parvan Simeonov is skeptical about forming a stable government. Now it is more difficult from a political point of view and a lot depends on who will get the second term:
“The most interesting situation is around the second position. BSP is in second place so far, but” We continue the change “have a bigger reserve. They have a little more open doors and are located on the political stage so that they can talk to more parties. to form a regular government, “said the sociologist.
According to him, the most curious thing is how Democratic Bulgaria would react if the second term went to the BSP.
“I don’t know how the DB would support or participate in a government with a BSP mandate. Therefore, ‘Continuing Change’ is the more rational option. If the BSP finds itself pressed between the parties of the status quo and change, it can accept support from GERB and MRF. they would do that, but the left is sitting in an awkward crossroads. “
According to Simeonov, “We continue the change” have restructured the protest space and limited the rising prospects of the growing “Democratic Bulgaria”.
“In addition, they deprived of stability” There are such people “who, even before the appearance of” We continue to change “, were to blame for the failure of the government, while the DB continued to grow. It’s important how they end their campaign. If the activity is high, it will benefit them. “
He thinks so making a joint parliamentary group between the DB and the PP makes no real sense.
“It would sound a bit like an official victory. Otherwise, purely politically, it is completely legitimate.” We continue the change “has a periphery that the DB can not reach. I’m not sure if they need to make a common group. In any case, they must leave the doors are open to each other. “
– .
