Even the birth of Lilibet Diana becomes a cause for legal battle. Harry e Meghan Markle they are furious with the BBC that he would spread the news that the Sussexes would not have asked the permission of Queen Elizabeth to call the second child with her intimate nickname with which only Philip could address her.
As soon as the unusual and tender was made known Baby Sussex’s name, the media went wild to track down hidden meanings and double ends about why Harry and Meghan chose to call his daughter Lilibet, especially after the accusations they have launched against the Royal Family. But the question seems to have been resolved by the fact that His Majesty had given his approval to his grandchildren. Then came the indiscretion that sent the Prince into a rage.
Indeed, a Buckingham Palace staff member told the BBC that the Queen was unaware of Harry and Meghan’s intentions and that “his opinion was never asked”Regarding the choice to call the little girl with her nickname.
After 90 minutes of the news being published by the BBC, Harry replied via his biographer Omid Scobie that the Queen was the first to be informed of the baby’s birth and the name he was given. Scobie then pointed out that the Sussex they would never use the name Lilibet without Elisabetta’s authorization.
A few hours after the rebuttal via Scobie, Harry decided to bring in his lawyers of the Schillings firm threatening the BBC with lawsuits if it did not deny the news. In the Sussex note sent to communicate their intentions to proceed by legal means, however, it is not clear whether there has been an effective request for permission against the Queen or whether the latter has simply been informed of the facts in advance. In any case, Elizabeth did not appear at all upset by Harry’s decision, so much so that he has already formally invited him to lunch when he returns to London in July.
However, the document against the BBC insists on the fact that: “The Duke spoke with his family before the announcement, in fact, her grandmother was the first member of the Royal Family to be informed ”. During that conversation, it reads, Harry would have asked the Queen for permission to use the name Lilibet but if she had proved against it, he and Meghan would never have called her daughter that.
At this point, the BBC has partially modified the reported news, without however mentioning the request for permission. Indeed the broadcaster insists on the revelations of the source of the Palazzo. The BBC therefore remains firm in its position, while Harry is not willing to give up, hence the decision to have the lawyers intervene.
Meanwhile, the Palazzo is silent, refusing to comment on the ongoing affair.
– .
