The land registry reform, already skipped in 2015, returns to materialize with the Recovery Plan. The consequences are obvious to all and would risk slowing down the recovery that the government itself expects. If the cadastral rents are revalued, not only will the Imu on second homes increase by 128% but there would also be an impact on the ISEE.
The land registry reform to update annuities
Here are the cornerstones of the reform, according to the reconstruction of Republic: “The inspiring principles would be three. First, the revaluation of cadastral values with the transition from annuities to average market values, obtained by applying an algorithm to the Omi values, the values calculated every six months by the Real Estate Observatory of the Revenue Agency. Second, move from rooms to square meters to determine the value of the property. Third, simplify the cadastral categories: no longer A1, A2, A3, A4 (stately, civil, economic, popular), but only O and S, ordinary and special properties such as public and commercial “.
How much would the IMU increase according to a Uil projection
According to the Uil, the land registry reform would make theImu. In Rome it would go from € 2,000 to € 5,640 per year (+ 183%), in Trento from € 700 to € 1,300 (+ 189%), in Milan from € 1,800 to € 4,000 (+ 123%).
And even those who do not have a second home would suffer the effect of the increase due to theIsee. “Reviewing the estimates would swell the ISEE by an average of 75,000 euros (+ 318%), according to the Uil: four times as much, with peaks of 7 times in Palermo and 6 in Catanzaro. Many people would lose concessions such as discounts on school canteens, nursery fees, university fees, rental bonuses, bill bonuses, RSA fees, assisted health residences “.
FdI says no to land registry reform: no more housing taxes
Brothers of Italy says no to a revision of the land registry as part of the hypothesized tax reform, because it would represent – underlines the deputy Tommaso Foti – “an initiative without any reason, as it is fatally destined to transfer, and in a heavy way, the taxation on a sector, the real estate one, already harassed by patrimonial and unfair taxes”.
–
