Home » today » News » Former Assistant Minister of Justice Comments on Case Involving Former Famous Thai Boxer, Mr. Somrak Khamsing and Underage Victim

Former Assistant Minister of Justice Comments on Case Involving Former Famous Thai Boxer, Mr. Somrak Khamsing and Underage Victim

On Dec. 17, the online world was talking a lot. After Mr. Samart Jenchaichitwanich Former Assistant Minister of Justice posted a clip via TikTok about the case of Ms. A (pseudonym), age 17, who filed a report at Muang Khon Kaen Police Station Claiming to have been attacked by Mr. Somrak Khamsing, a former famous boxer. Taken to a hotel and committed an indecent act After getting to know each other in a pub

The former Assistant Minister of Justice stated that “Can advise Somrak if he really did something wrong to confess. But if it doesn’t cause you to sue the pub for allowing people under 20 years of age to use its services, causing Mr. Somrak to be damaged.” In which in the said clip Also revealed that I would like to tell Mr. Somrak what the facts are and proceed accordingly. Don’t twist the testimony at all. What has been accused of Mr. Somrak himself must see whether it is true or not. If it’s true, confess it. If it’s heavy, it will be light, without wasting the time of the justice process. But if it is not true, then evidence must be found to refute the arguments that he accused Mr. Somrak.

The justice system of Thailand It’s an accusatory system. The accuser must be the one who collects the evidence. Until it was believed that there was an offender. Today society believes that Mr. Somrak is the perpetrator. He heard from Mr. Somrak’s interview that he said: I didn’t know that children were under 17. Once I found out, I stopped. The issue is whether Mr. Somrak has filed a lawsuit against the pub or not. Today, Mr. Somrak has to file a civil lawsuit because Mr. Somrak went to a pub and met a child under 17 years of age in the pub. In the end, it caused damage. Mr. Somrak must be a suspect in a criminal case. must sue for damages against the entertainment venue Because entertainment venues already have laws governing Do not give it to those who Under 20 years of age to use the service If any entertainment venue allows people under 20 years of age to use the service must have their license revoked and was closed for 5 years according to NCPO orders. No. 22 / 2015

“Today, the NCPO order is still in place. Mr. Somrak must have a lawyer go and file a civil lawsuit. Sue the entertainment venue where Mr. Somrak visited. Access the service Because it is considered that Mr. Somrak was a user of the service and then met a woman in the pub. It is honestly believed that he must be over 20 years old. When we can believe that He was over 20 years old and we said we would go to the hotel by ourselves. Already single status No offense occurred. Because it is voluntary.”

Mr. Samart continued that today Ms. A testified that she had informed Mr. Somrak that he was 17 years old but that Mr. Somrak still took him there, we do not know. What are the facts? Therefore, Mr. Somrak Must give evidence in court and summarized in court But above all that There must be evidence to believe that Mr. Somrak himself was the victim. Criminal liability must have all the following elements: External intention and internal intention Therefore, Mr. Somrak must not intend to take children under 17 years of age to travel or engage in obscene acts. Definitely sexually assault me. Because the law forbids it.

“I also have to leave Mr. Somrak. Justice exists but we must seek it. Today, society has already accused Mr. Somrak. As for the 17-year-old, he is protected. Society still doesn’t know who is right. Whoever is wrong, please give an example case. It’s like a car crash. For example, a motorcycle and a sedan collide. No matter how social it is, in the beginning the sedan was at fault first. Then go and investigate. Finally, did that motorcycle run a red light? Did you drive carelessly? It is already a universal principle. Mr. Somrak is a famous person. And it’s male. In which society will have to accuse Mr. Somrak first. Therefore, Mr. Somrak must do as I said: go and sue the entertainment venue. Because the said entertainment establishment claimed that Ms. A used fake documents. In this matter, has Ms. A been informed yet?”

Mr. Samart concluded by saying that Today we don’t know who is right and who is wrong, what is true and what is false, but the reporting process is guaranteed by law. Whoever makes a false report must be punished. Anyone who makes a false complaint must be punished. Whoever perjures must be punished. Whoever gives false testimony must be punished. The law already exists. It is already fair to people. And in Thailand, we have 3 courts, the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court. I don’t know how many years it took to prove it to those 3 courts. But today Mr. Somrak has been sentenced. “I leave it to the person who is Mr. Somrak’s lawyer. You must show the way to help your client and ensure justice for all parties. Finally, if Somrak realizes that he really did something wrong, confess like a gentleman. Don’t waste time.”..

Thank you for the pictures and information from @jopstoploss.

2023-12-17 05:07:00
#case #reversed #Samart #reveals #variable #suggests #Somrak #action #pub #letting #17yearold #girl #causing #damage #Daily #News

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.