Bar exam candidates are checking their test number at Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu. yunhap news
– Controversy continues over the 10th bar exam, which is held for 5 days and 4 nights from the 5th to the 9th. Notice that the notice of’prohibition of line-of-law’ has been reversedOf course, Yonsei University Law School (Law School) Mock Exam Questions with similar structure to explanation dataIt is because of the suspicion that it was done. The lawyer who raised the suspicion announced a legal suit, saying that he would file a related complaint on the 11th.
Candidates who are angry at the changed underline notice
– In the past, bar exams have not always allowed any indications such as memos (underlined) in the law. Previously, the Ministry of Justice also gave candidates the name of the’Minister of Justice’ in the’Announcement of the 10th bar exam date and place and candidates’ compliance requirements’.You shouldn’t use lines, etc.’And announced.
–
Announcement of the 10th bar exam date and time and candidate compliance. Reader provided
–
However, the Ministry of Justice made another explanation at around 1:30 pm on the 7th, when the test was being conducted. “We will inform you about complaints of complaints from all of the candidates as follows.”Underline is possible (highlighter underline is possible)” At the same time, he apologized, saying, “Please understand that it caused inconvenience to test takers because the delivery and implementation of the unified test administrator code of conduct was not smooth.”
As memos and highlighters were allowed only at some test centers, civil complaints to the Ministry of Justice among attorneys took a new position.
In response, Mr. Byeon Si-saeng, A (32), exclaimed, “The attitude of the Ministry of Justice to say that it was an act that was originally allowed is beyond the neglect of bystanding and neglecting acts permitted only at some test sites. Attorney Hyo-kyung Bang from the bar exam said, “In the end, students have this code even during breaks, so it is impossible to discern whether it was underlined during the exam or during the break.” “In a situation where time is tight, In the case type and record type in which the answer is to be written, whether the main article is underlined or checked has a tremendous effect on the test.”
–
Letter notice from the Ministry of Justice. Reader provided
–
However, the Ministry of Justice explained that the purpose of prohibiting the line of the code was to consider other users because the code was collected every hour for four days and distributed randomly and used by several candidates. In order to minimize contact between candidates due to the spread of the new coronavirus infection (Corona 19), the first user name was entered in the law and the policy was changed to use it for four days, so there is no need to prohibit the line of the law. However, it did not reveal a different position in the fact that the announcement of Junggu Heating was carried out for each test site.
Transformation problem similar to Yonsei University mock exam?
– In a hurry Some of the test questions were presented similarly to the explanation data for the Yonsei law school practice test.Was even raised suspicion.
The start of the suspicion is that Sung-min Kang, a spokesman for the Seoul Bar Association (written by the law firm), posted a post on his Facebook page titled’The 10th Bar Exam Questions and Mock Exam Questions at Parent School’ on the 7th. It is a problem that is not in any textbook on the market.” Then he said, “The best answer to the bar exam question only needs to be renamed in that resource.“I pointed out. Currently, attorney Kang said, “Please disclose the list of members to be asked right away,” and said, “I plan to file a criminal charge next Monday.”
The controversial issue was the content of the contention of rights disputes with regard to the property of the servants and when the administration forcibly accepts rights or titles for the public good. However, this is the point of suspicion that even detailed issues overlap with the explanation data for the recorded mock test distributed in the’Public Law Dispute Practice’ class at Yonsei University Law School last year.
![[연합뉴스]](https://i0.wp.com/pds.joins.com/news/component/htmlphoto_mmdata/202101/09/104381ef-f41e-4ef0-b7e7-a246a7605302.jpg?w=900&ssl=1)
–
[연합뉴스]
–
In response to this, the Ministry of Justice said, “There is no law school professor among the members of the public law record type questionnaire, As soon as the facts are confirmed, we will take necessary measures in accordance with laws and principles.“We will make sure that the fairness of the bar exam is not compromised in any case.”
The controversy spread in and out of the legal profession. Na Gyeong-won, a former member of the Future Integration Party (currently the People’s Power), said, “It is a very serious matter.” Criticized. He said, “Unfortunately, the ministry in charge of this situation is the Ministry of Justice again,” and “Please, let’s do things right.”
Reporters Kim Soo-min and Park Hyun-joo [email protected]
–
