As a side note, it should be said that Minister Võrklaeva could be understood humanly, because he also wanted to say something positive for a change, be a good child and redeem a small gift package from Santa Claus for 400 million. Unfortunately, the coalition partners did not care much for this idea.
But communicating tax changes or making other decisions in a situation where trust is low is, to put it mildly, difficult. It does not increase trust when the coalition partners themselves exchange impressions of each other in front of the cameras. But when the crisis is really here and you need to give messages that people will appreciate and take into account…?
Thus, Ansip is of course not exaggerating when talking about a possible security threat, and that is actually a shame. Because security is the keyword that first comes to mind when thinking about kaja Kallas.
The fact that the cauldron of dissatisfaction is simmering at full speed in the Reform Party is not just a matter of Andrus Ansip. Vice-chairmen Jürgen Ligi and Maris Lauri also publicly admitted that the low rating is a problem and that the strategy day of the party was brought from the end of January to the beginning of January for no reason. A quick solution to the crisis is needed.
A few months ago, in the light of the East scandal, I wrote about how Kaja Kallas will leave the office of prime minister at one point or another. Not because he did something wrong in his opinion, but because he wanted to protect his legacy, his family and his party. This has been seen in Estonian politics before, and then it has returned stronger.
Nor did Andrus Ansipki make only good and popular decisions as Prime Minister. You just have to know how to come and go at the right time. Unfortunately, Kaja Kallas let this moment pass in such a way that both her party and herself will probably remember this time as a negative legacy. However, everything could have been different…
