“There has been propaganda for four weeks that there will be such a political project. The same sources of messages, the same speakers have convinced us that these are the most successful ministers. Everything is a simple political engineering. It will be neither a political party nor a political movement. ” This was stated to BGNES by the political scientist Assoc. Prof. Antoniy Galabov, commenting on the topic with the participation in the political life of the two former caretaker ministers Kiril Petkov and Asen Vassilev.
Petkov spoke about the party they are making with Vassilev: I was in very deep thoughts what it is …
“The other very important thing is what the chairman of Ecoglasnost Emil Georgiev told. It’s about shopping. This is a prototype of a presidential party, which should play the role of a link between other political formations in the next parliament, for to achieve a pro-presidential majority. What we see is another step towards a change in the form of government in Bulgaria, “said the political scientist.
This is the name of Petkov’s and Vassilev’s party and who pulled into it
He determined the upcoming new project as a “siphon”, which will draw votes from both the periphery of the BSP and Democratic Bulgaria (DB), but also threatens Maya Manolova and company.
According to him, the country is in a paradoxical situation, in which power is transferred from caretaker to caretaker government.
“Rumen Radev allowed the Yanev 2 cabinet to take an oath before him. I understand how degraded our notions of statehood and order have been, but no one can swear before him. He himself takes the oath before the National Assembly, “he added in his analysis.
Analyzer spore GERB-UDF has played its role of opposition well in two consecutive parliaments. “I expect, and this is shown by the preliminary data, that the hard core of voters will stabilize. The initial hesitation gradually recedes. I assume that GERB will be able to return to its results from April 4, in other words, it will be able to restore at least another hundred thousand votes, which it lost for various reasons, “Galabov added.
„The parties in the next National Assembly must learn to talk to GERB-UDF and MRF, as this model we have witnessed is not working.. There was a ruling majority in both the 45th and 46th. Well, one majority adopted the changes to the Electoral Code, and the other updated the budget and adopted the changes related to the Witness Protection Bureau.
The big question is that there was a pro-presidential majority that was on Rumen Radev’s agenda., and not on the agenda of Bulgaria.
The question that citizens have to answer is: Why did this majority refuse to take responsibility for the government of Bulgaria?, the political scientist thinks.
– .
