Agali police in Kozhikode have decided not to file a case against individuals who assisted former SFI leader K. Vidya in staying hidden. The investigation team has determined that such measures are unnecessary given the current circumstances. Police have been stationed at the house where Vidya was hiding in Vadakara Kuto.
Vidya sought refuge at her friend Rovit’s house in Vadakara Kuto. She was apprehended at 5:40 pm on Wednesday. The following day, Rovit’s father Raghavan and other family members vacated the premises around 11 am. Although it is evident that Rovit and his family aided Vidya in her concealment, the police believe that filing a case against them is unwarranted. They argue that the offense committed by Vidya is relatively minor and not of a serious nature.
The police did not summon Rovit for questioning in relation to the investigation. Consequently, they argue that there is no evidence to suggest that Vidya was being harbored. The police continue to maintain a presence at the house where Vidya hid, bolstering security after the UDF staged a protest at the location.
The demonstration called for the arrest of those who assisted Vidya in her hiding. Critics have accused the police of displaying the same level of protection towards Vidya as they do towards those who aided her concealment. Furthermore, doubts have been raised regarding whether the Kutothe house mentioned in the police’s custody application is indeed the same location where Vidya was hiding.
In summary, the Agali police have chosen not to pursue a case against individuals who provided assistance to Vidya during her period of hiding.
How do the Agali police justify their decision to not file a case against those who assisted former SFI leader K. Vidya in staying hidden?
Agali police in Kozhikode have made a surprising decision – they will not be filing a case against those who assisted former SFI leader K. Vidya in staying hidden. Surprising, because one would expect the authorities to take action against individuals who aid someone on the wrong side of the law. But the investigation team believes that such measures are unnecessary given the circumstances at hand.
Vidya found refuge in her friend Rovit’s house in Vadakara Kuto. It was there that she was ultimately apprehended, at 5:40 pm on Wednesday. Curiously, the following day, Rovit’s father Raghavan and other family members vacated the premises around 11 am. This raises the obvious question – did they play a role in helping Vidya hide? The police could have pursued a case against them, but they deemed it unwarranted. Their argument is that the offense committed by Vidya is relatively minor and not of a serious nature.
It’s worth noting that Rovit was not even summoned for questioning regarding the investigation. The police claim that without any evidence pointing towards Vidya being harbored, there was no need to involve Rovit. However, they are still taking precautions by maintaining a presence at the house where Vidya hid. This comes after a protest by the UDF, demanding the arrest of those who aided Vidya in her concealment.
Critics, on the other hand, accuse the police of offering Vidya the same level of protection as those who assisted her. It raises concerns about the fairness and integrity of the investigation. In fact, doubts have even surfaced about whether the Kutothe house mentioned in the custody application is indeed the same place where Vidya had been hiding.
So, while the Agali police have decided to let the individuals who helped Vidya escape any legal consequences, controversy has arisen. Some question the motives behind this decision, while others wonder about the sincerity of the police’s efforts. Only time will tell if their judgment was sound or if it will come back to haunt them.
It is a relief to see Agali Police’s decision of not filing a case against those who aided Vidya to stay in hiding. Sometimes, circumstances demand unconventional actions, and it’s important to prioritize the well-being and safety of individuals over legal technicalities. Kudos to the police for displaying empathy and understanding in this matter.
This decision by Agali Police sets a concerning precedent, undermining the seriousness of aiding a person in hiding from the law. It raises questions about equal treatment under the law and the commitment to justice.