What was the sentence of the footballer accused of sexual assault? – 2024-02-23 10:16:35

After a long wait for the conclusion of the footballer’s high-profile case Dani Alves, this Thursday the justice system finally handed down its sentence. After a relatively short but no less fateful trial, the Spanish justice system has determined the penance that the Brazilian must serve after being found guilty of sexual assault.

It was at the end of 2022 that the crime occurred, in the early hours of December 31, when Alves visited the Sutton nightclub in Barcelona in the company of a friend, Bruno Brasil. The defender met a woman on the dance floor and later committed the crime in a bathroom at the facility, next to the VIP booth that Brasil and Alves shared that night.

What sentence did Dani Alves receive for his crime of sexual assault?

Section 21 of the Provincial Court of Barcelona sentenced the footballer to four years and six months in prison after declaring him guilty. In addition, he imposed five years of supervised release once he has served the prison sentence, the prohibition of approaching the victim’s home or workplace within 1,000 meters and of communicating with her for nine years and six months.

The former Barcelona footballer was also sentenced to the penalty of special disqualification for the exercise of employment, public office, profession or trades related to minors for a period of five years, to be applied once the prison sentence has also been completed. n.

He was also awarded compensation of US$162,883 for moral damage. and injuries caused, two months of fine with a daily fee of US$ 162 for the minor crime of injuries and payment of procedural costs.

You can also read: Former Liga MX player reveals that he suffered bullying when he was an active player

This sentence, however, is different from the one requested by the Prosecutor’s Office, which requested nine years in prison; as well as the private accusation, which requested the maximum contemplated by law for a sexual assault with carnal access: 12 years. This is because the court considered the mitigating factor in the reparation of the damage requested by his lawyer at the end of the oral trial, as the defendant had deposited compensation of US$162,000 during the investigation phase.

With this ruling, the court considers that it has been proven that “the victim did not consent to the relationship and that there are elements of evidence, in addition to the testimony of the complainant, to understand that the rape has been proven.”