Unfortunately, the ostrich simply refuses to poke its head, insisting on denying the “immigration surge”. Instead, “immigration”, “departure” and “travel” are just a matter of not getting a “harmful departure” project. The Chinese understand that this is the same purpose of “static management in the original area” and “closure and situ control”, which is to avoid the word “closed city”, which is to refuse to face reality.
Looking at the responses of various officials to the immigration wave is also an eye opener. She is more impressive than her Hong Kong sister who wears a swimsuit. At least Yu Li Qingping doesn’t need to be so angry.
For example, the priority of many immigrants is the education of their children, which means that they have lost faith in Hong Kong’s highly politicized educational environment and do not want to become another “wolf warrior” and “little pink”. However, in an interview with the media, Education Secretary Cai Ruolian felt that family immigration does not mean that he does not trust Hong Kong education and also the easing of immigration thresholds from foreign countries. it has become an incentive.
This is shit. If they trust Hong Kong’s education system, how could Hong Kong parents “die” just because “foreign countries have eased immigration thresholds”?
Don’t forget that former Education Secretary Yang Runxiong said he “doesn’t want to fully understand what Hong Kong (education system) should do to help their (children) organize”, so he used “simple” methods and methods. “lazy” to organize Children attend international schools and study abroad.
In a word: In the past, parents feared that their children would become “crazy ducks”, but today they are afraid of becoming “wolf warriors”, so they have to leave.
Liu Zhaojia, vice president of the National Association for Hong Kong and Macao Studies, is more frank, noting that it’s not a bad thing for some people to leave Hong Kong due to political issues, and asked if the central government needs to absorb these people. of Hong Kong who disagree with the central government.
Apparently Liu is telling the truth, please leave the “race of not-me” but if you think about it it is not right A city must not welcome different voices, is this the integration of diversity? After all, does not Hong Kong in 1997 blossom with a hundred flowers? Why have people not left Hong Kong due to “different political views” in the past, but today’s Hong Kong cannot tolerate dissent? “Leaving due to differing political views” can only show that the city of Hong Kong today cannot tolerate dissenting voices. This is “reason enough” for immigration.
As for Huang Liuquan, Deputy Director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Bureau, “Some say that after the implementation of the National Security Act in Hong Kong, it will become increasingly land or mainland oriented. These words are alarmist. and politically partial. ” Bad phenomenon? So why does the government sing about the Greater Bay Area every day and ask us to rely on the motherland?
The author is a topical commentator
(If the news articles published on this website are criticized, the purpose is to highlight the errors or deficiencies in the relevant systems, policies or measures and the purpose is to promote the correction or elimination of such errors or deficiencies and to improve through legal channels hatred, resentment or hostility from other communities)
–
