Home » today » World » “Two Years and Eight Months” of the Sino-U.S. Technology War | Blog Post

“Two Years and Eight Months” of the Sino-U.S. Technology War | Blog Post

The two-year and eight-month Sino-US technological war will come to an end with Trump’s step down. Biden took office but the war continued. However, the United States no longer acted alone, but organized G7 + 3 against China.

On May 14, 2019, Fox TV anchor Trish Regan declared war on China on behalf of Trump. She pointed out that China’s prosperity was at the expense of US interests. China stole US dollars in billions of dollars. Therefore, “We don’t There is no choice, there is only one battle.” He claimed: “China, you have provoked the wrong war!” The next day, the President of the United States declared a state of emergency and allowed the White House to impose sanctions against “foreign opponents”, citing Huawei as a threat to US national security. The reasons are: 1. Huawei is not allowed to sell 5G technology to the United States; 2. Huawei is not allowed to purchase chips and important semiconductors from the United States. The final blow before Trump’s resignation was to reiterate the withdrawal of Huawei’s chips.

Trump’s extreme pressure caused Huawei to lose its position as the number one smartphone in the world, and orders for 5G infrastructure in major European markets were also lost one by one. Huawei’s internal injuries are serious. The outside world estimates that it will only last two and a half years at most, because there are no more chips available. What was unexpected was the outbreak of the new crown pandemic last year. While China was struggling to fight the epidemic in the first half of the year and achieved control results, the United States was out of control. Today, China’s technological war has not completely failed, but the United States has become a “Pandemic Defeated Country.” America), in other words, the United States is not much better than Huawei, it is also very internally injured.

The United States will not fall all of a sudden, but its image is very problematic. Some people say that the United States is not as good as the “tottering British Empire” and its current situation is comparable to that of the Ming Dynasty 400 years ago. Just as Western scholars and domestic public intellectuals reminded not to underestimate the United States, Trump lost the election in November, and the election results led to rare social disturbances. When the Capitol Hill was destroyed, the phenomenon of “Ming Dynastyization” in the United States became more prominent: Disaster relief has failed and politics has reached a deadlock.

The United States has undergone a dramatic reversal. There is no chance of winning alone. After Biden takes office, fighting the epidemic and resuming work are the most important tasks. It will be very difficult to maintain a comprehensive containment of China at the same time, only with the help of allies. The core alliance of the United States is G7, an international organization composed of the world’s seven developed economies. It was established in 1973 and its members are the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan. The United States is going to join Australia, South Korea, and India. From a background perspective, they are all democratic countries with a Western system. This G7+3 is both strong and humiliating to China because it means that all major developed industrial countries must Put China in a completely isolated position.

Profile picture


If G7+3 is formed under Biden’s efforts, China will face more than simply technological restrictions and the loss of major overseas 5G markets. The financial, economic, and technological standards set by the above-mentioned countries in the future can be consolidated into a line of defense. , Hindering the pace of China’s development. The common interests of this organization are ideology and Western values, that is, the dispute between “technological democracy” and “technological dictatorship” that Biden has divided. You may ask, can ideology be a meal? No, but this alliance can use this as an excuse to increase the bargaining chip when dealing with China individually. If they are in the same voice, they are more likely to collectively take advantage of China.

This time China cannot learn from Huang Feihong. Don’t give in, benevolence and morality. There is only one way. China must do well in the role of Ye Wen and be prepared to play ten of them. Be scared!

– .

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.