“I don’t see anything catastrophic or sensational in her behavior. It’s an old tradition to resign or talk about resignation when you take responsibility,” he said. “Resignation and responsibility are not the same thing, but they are connected. I’m not surprised. But I’m surprised by another – that the Initiative Committee for the Election of the President and the caretaker cabinet may demand the resignation of a party leader – this is extremely unusual!” , the analyst is categorical. Most of her political activity went under the sign of her resignation, Vatsev added.
–
“All politicians say that a great crisis is coming, but the great crisis is already a fact – it is a political crisis of the worst type.” This …
–
–
“These things hardly impress her, but it is really surprising that internal party forces, for which we have long known what they are fighting for, and institutions outside her party want her resignation. Thus, the fact that the two fronts she was fighting a battle – the internal party and the non-party party are now merging into a common front – that is, the moment of truth is approaching. , high, categorical and concrete, because there are many facts that have been kept secret so far that need to be put on the table, “he said.
“This silence on her part, which I understand as a purely human being, was a political mistake. She was obliged not to keep anything secret, because the battle has been going on for a long time and the truth is an argument in this battle. “The battles that are being fought now in the BSP need the whole truth all the time, clearly and understandably. If it is deliberately kept silent, yes, it was really wrong,” Vatsev said.
“Ninova expected blows from Borissov and received them. The fact that Borisov is no longer prime minister means that he is not as effective in the fight against her, which is why her opponents are able to generalize their positions and call from different directions. In fact, it was in an absolutely impossible position to fight outside its party in the system of power struggle and within its own party, no party can win with such a purulent abscess within itself. First of all, the internal party problems are to be solved and they cannot be kept silent in the name of some general party hypocritical unanimity. Ninova was silent too much and for too long. to put on the table “, added Vatsev.
“Radev is one of the main pillars of the motives for the attacks on Ninova. His personal motives are not entirely clear to me. In my opinion, this comes from his desire to expand his support to the right than in the beginning, and this naturally creates tension between the president. and the party that was behind it. This is an old process, but there is nothing surprising. Valentin Vatsev said that this time the BSP lost a lot of votes because of Radev’s attack, because this time the BSP left liberals voted for the left neoliberal formation “We continue the change”, which probably will make the new liberal Bulgarian government.
–
“Ninova is in danger of being in third place for the second time, and this is an irreversible problem, but she can still say the right thing …
–
–
“The Bulgarian president stood over this project with his positions, so there is no way for Ninova to keep silent about an obvious fact that the president was working as a force against the BSP,” he said, adding that Radev had committed treason. “Left-wing liberals are trying to seize power and become a dominant force, and Radev is working hard to do so. It depends on Ninova’s will, her strategy and tactics, whether they will succeed,” the analyst predicted.
–
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’, ‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’); fbq(‘init’, ‘231534010906114’); fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
