Bad news for many spouses who risk having to deal with a real nightmare in the event of tax evasion. Here’s what you need to know about it.
Any good or service we wish to purchase inevitably leads to having to deal with the relative economic outlay. It is therefore not surprising that the money often ends up becoming the subject of discussion, even among spouses. An issue that can often bring with it aftermath, with inevitable negative repercussions.
We are not just talking about the repercussions from an emotional point of view, but also about any requests from the Tax. For example, one wonders if, in the event of a husband’s tax evasion, the seizure can also be triggered on the assets of the wife. A story that unfortunately concerns a lot of people and for which it is good to clarify.
Tax evasion, bad news for spouses: everything you need to know
On the basis of the provisions of the Supreme Court, in the event that the husband commits tax evasion, the tax authorities can also claim back on some assets owned by the wife, such as jewelry and watches. This happens because reference is made to the principle of sharing of goods that is acquired with marriage. In particular, thanks to sentence no. 32878 of 6 September 2021, the Court of Cassation rejected the appeal of a wife, whose husband was targeted by the tax authorities due to tax evasion.
Well, as can be seen from ItaliaOggi, having found purchases made by the tax evader and since there is no separation of assets, the Tax Authority can act on the assets of the lady. In particular, it was decided that non-returned movable property, such as watches and jewelery, must be subject to precautionary measures as they are considered forms of investment in safe-haven assets of significant value, such as Rolex watches, which can be traced back to the crime committed by the accused, or her husband.
READ ALSO >>> Buying a house, saving a lot of money is possible: here’s how
However, the situation is different in the case of goods separation. As reported by the judges of the Court of Cassation, in fact, “the ablation measure must be excluded when it is ascertained that the income of the spouse unrelated to the crime, who claims certain assets, is such as to justify their purchase“. This means that no assets will be confiscated if it is ascertained that the wife’s income, for example, is unrelated to the crime as the couple has decided to adopt the separation of assets.
–
