Assets, voluntary action or forced withdrawal from the account, which of these scenarios is possible to overcome the crisis?
The terrible health emergency will leave a heavy legacy of economic crisis to face, and the specter is that this crisis will be addressed by putting hand in the wallets of the Italians themselves.
Here we go back to talking about assets or forced withdrawal on the account. Even if there is a third, more serene way that is being feared and that perhaps could be implemented.
Many agree with the Patrimonial, such as Pierferdinando Casini, who in Agorà, said he was “in agreement on the fact that the more he has, the more he must give”.
Even the 5-star senator Paola Nugnes, on the pages of the Huffington Post, said she was in favor of a patrimonial. The principle is always the same: the more he has, the more he must give.
READ ALSO >>> Postal savings books, bad news, the patrimonial takes place
READ ALSO >>> Amendment ko, “madness”: the patrimonial does not eat the panettone
The specter of equity on current accounts: will it really be introduced?
Property is one of the most unpopular taxes ever. But it is not the only one.
Another government way to find money, perhaps more hateful than patrimonial is the forced withdrawal. Exactly as Amato did in 1992.
Just the thought that someone forcibly withdraws a sum from our checking account overnight gives us chills. Although some might think of it as a necessary weapon to deal with the crisis.
Yet there is a better and more serene scenario, which is the one hypothesized by the Deputy Minister of Economy Pier Paolo Baretta, which denied the possibility of both the patrimonial and the forced withdrawal.
“The idea is that of one mass mobilization of the entire country, but in absolutely voluntary forms. We will try to attracting savings into virtuous investment channels and with reinforced guarantees”Said the deputy minister.
Who knows if it will really happen. We’ll see.
–
