The 41-year-old Polish referee was faced with claims in the French media that he should have ruled out his goal. Messi Because two substitutes entered the field before Messi’s goal crossed the line.
More than 200,000 French fans have signed a petition for the replay of the final due to… "his mistakes" perceived, but Marciniak defiantly responded to the criticism leveled at him, showing a photo on his phone of "7 French players on the pitch" once logged in Mbappe The second goal of the draw for his national team.
During a press conference, Marciniak pulled out his phone with a photo that he said was around the time Kylian Mbappe scored one of his three goals against Argentina.
And he said: "The French didn’t mention this image, as you can see how there were 7 Frenchmen on the pitch when Mbappé scored".
After applying Argentina With two goals before the end of the first half from Messi andAngel DiMariaArgentina fell behind as Mbappé scored twice in two minutes to take the game into extra time.
The next controversial moment came in the 108th minute when he saved the French goalkeeper Hugo Loris Argentine shooting Lautaro Martinez In goal, however, Lloris’ efforts to save his goal well, did not pay off as the ball fell in front of Messi to score the third goal from close range.
And the French media believed that the referee should not have approved the goal, as two Argentine players entered the field at that moment.
It landed on a newspaper website "The Team" French headline news Balmanchet broad titled "Why shouldn’t Argentina’s third goal be approved?"and he claimed it "Two emotionally charged surrogates" They entered the field before Messi’s shot crossed the line, that’s the question "Absolutely prohibited".
The goal has been validated by Video assisted technology "the mouse"that Martinez was offside, but replays showed he was not, leading to wild celebrations among the Argentine players and fans.
However, it is not known whether mouse technology has also taken into consideration the two alternatives that have entered the field "The Team" You feel that it had to be granted France Free kick by law.
The newspaper indicated that paragraph 9 of Law 3 of the Football Laws states the following: "If, after a goal has been scored, the referee realizes before play restarts that an extra person was on the field of play at the time the goal was scored: The referee must disallow the goal if the additional person is: a player, a substitute, a substituted player, the sent-off or a team official who scored the goal; Play must be restarted with a direct free kick from where the extra person is standing".
The referee’s claim that France’s substitutes were on the field when Mbappé scored one of his goals should have been rejected.
Mbappe scored the third goal in extra time before Argentina continued on their way to winning the championship world Cup For the third time, on penalties.
“>
processed, broken Polish domain for the final match of the World Cup Simone Marciniak His silence on allegations that Argentina’s third goal against France should have been disallowed.
The 41-year-old Polish referee was faced with claims in the French media that he should have ruled out his goal. Messi Because two substitutes entered the field before Messi’s goal crossed the line.
More than 200,000 French fans have signed a petition for a replay of the final due to his perceived ‘mistakes’, but Marsignac has defiantly responded to the criticism, displaying a photo on his phone of ‘7 French players on the pitch’ when he marked. Mbappe The second goal of the draw for his national team.
During a press conference, Marciniak pulled out his phone with a photo that he said was around the time Kylian Mbappe scored one of his three goals against Argentina.
He said: “The French didn’t mention this photo, as you can see how there were 7 Frenchmen on the pitch when Mbappé scored a goal.”
After applying Argentina With two goals before the end of the first half from Messi andAngel DiMariaArgentina fell behind as Mbappe scored twice in two minutes to take the match into extra time.
The next controversial moment came in the 108th minute when he saved the French goalkeeper Hugo Loris Argentine shooting Lautaro Martinez In goal, however, Lloris’ efforts to save his goal well, did not pay off as the ball fell in front of Messi to score the third goal from close range.
And the French media believed that the referee should not have approved the goal, as two Argentine players entered the field at that moment.
On the website of the French newspaper L’Equipe, in the headline “Why Argentina’s third goal should not be approved”, an article appeared which stated that “two emotionally charged substitutes” entered the field before the shot of Messi crossed the goal line, which is “absolutely prohibited”.
The goal has been validated by Video assisted technology ‘The Mouse’, that Martinez was offside, but replays showed he was not, leading to wild celebrations among the Argentine players and fans.
It is not known whether the VAR technique also considered the two substitutes who entered the field, but L’Equipe believes it should reward France Free kick by law.
The newspaper pointed out that Article 9 of Law 3 of the Football Laws states the following: “If the referee becomes aware, after scoring a goal, before play restarts, that one more person was on the field at the moment the goal is scored: the referee must not award a goal if the additional person: a player, substitute player, substituted player, sent off or official of the team that scored the goal; play must be restarted with a direct free kick from where the extra person is.
The referee’s claim that France’s substitutes were on the field when Mbappé scored one of his goals should have been rejected.
Mbappe scored the third goal in extra time before Argentina continued on their way to winning the championship world Cup For the third time, on penalties.
