One of the pieces of evidence the prosecutor wants to discuss in court is the wiretaps taken at MSB Legal, as well as records of tracking of shipments to and from the law firm.
–
The court did not allow this, as did the use of spatial interceptions from the lobbyist Rittig’s apartment at the Ventana Hotel. “The finding court did not deal with all the evidence and circumstances relevant to the decision. These errors affect the accuracy of the findings of fact, “said Borgula.
–
The public prosecutor proposed that the acquittal verdict of the Prague City Court of last May be overturned and that the case be returned for a new hearing. This is rejected by the defendants and their lawyers.
–
“The appeal of the public prosecutor is a controversy with how the court evaluated the evidence,” said lawyer Jiří Matzner, according to whom Borgula “chooses the evidence as he sees fit.” “All the evidence has been taken for a fair assessment of the case,” another lawyer, Vlastimil Rampula, responded.
–
The DPP case has two main branches. The first concerns the contracts that the company concluded in 2008 to ensure the sale of tickets, the printing of tickets and the creation of an electronic ticket. The second describes the alleged money laundering carried out under these contracts through a number of foreign companies.
–
According to the indictment, the damage totaled almost half a billion crowns. According to the invalid judgment, however, the tunneling of the company did not take place and no damage occurred.
—
