Home » today » Technology » The BOE’s surreal bug fix that provokes laughter on Twitter

The BOE’s surreal bug fix that provokes laughter on Twitter

news" data-mrf-recirculation="noticias-relacionadas-noticia">

Related news

The Official State Gazette (BOE) of the edition of this past Thursday, March 18, has included a faith of errors that if they tell us, we won’t believe it because it seems like a joke. It is common for the newspaper to amend errors and include corrections in its editions, but we are to ensure that none of them have had the reception that the tweeters are giving the latter, which refers to a word included in the March 4 newsletter .

Specifically, the correction of the BOE error refers to the publication of the resolution of a tender corresponding to the Ministry of Ecological Transition that referred, in turn, to the Demarcation of Coasts in Andalusia. The intention was to fill a vacancy in the position of Project and Works Technician in Cádiz. It is at this point that you could read that the position had been awarded to “Digo” instead of “Diego”, the first name of the professional who would have obtained the position.

As what does not appear in the BOE is not made official and it is essential that the award of the tender is correctly recorded in order to be executed, the correction of errors has had to be published to recognize Diego the vacancy as a new Project and Works Technician. But, of course, in the text of the correction they have written that “where it says: ‘I say’, it should say: ‘Diego'” and the joke has been made by itself.

A viral error

Avid for humor, as is usual on Twitter, the social network has welcomed with open arms the capture of the BOE shared by the professor of Constitutional Law, Miguel Presno Linera, whose tweet has quickly gone viral:

And it has caused thousands of reactions like these:

The truth is that the correction of errors in the BOE is the order of the day, although never promoting such a great play on words as this. In fact, errors are corrected practically every day and, in 2015, they even made a compendium of them in an article. In those first 15 years since the beginning of the century, the average number of misprints per day is slightly more than one, but it has been decreasing over time.

– .

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.