The criminal complaint made by Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu to the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office had a great repercussion.
Istanbul Metropolitan Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu opened the files of the AKP era IMM administration, and it was alleged that there was corruption in the high-priced tender held in the previous period Medya A.Ş. Carrying the tender and the bills to the judiciary, IMM President Ekrem İmamoğlu filed a criminal complaint against 23 people, including the current Minister of Transport, Adil Karaismailoğlu.
297 different news links related to this subject were included in the scope of access restriction. The request for an access barrier came from the Minister of Transport and Infrastructure, Adil Karaismailoğlu. Karaismailoğlu was among the names who made a criminal complaint in the news in question, as the AKP-era IMM Deputy Secretary General, tender and spending official.
The reasoning for the decision included the following statements:
“When the internet outputs in the file and the request petition are examined, the requester is serving as the Minister of Transport and Infrastructure of the Republic of Turkey, the content of the news subject to the request contains discourses that can be misunderstood to damage the reputation and dignity of the requester, the expressions, style and the expressions used in the content subject to the request are When evaluated, the balance of expression and essence and form used in the title is broken, the purpose is exceeded in this sense by making unnecessary attributions, these associations are also included in the established jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court regarding the dignity of the requester by exceeding the limits of freedom of expression and the freedom of information of the press in the ECHR. The area contains content that may constitute ‘violation of rights at first sight’, that is an attack on the reputation of the requester, these contents undermine the reputation of the requester in the eyes of the society and Since the publications that are subject to the request are discourses that violate personal rights, the legal requirements have been established in accordance with the Law No. 5651, and the request of the requesting agent’s request for the blocking of access to the contents of the petition has to be decided separately and the decision has been made as follows. “
– .
