The presentation, made by the lawyer Gervasio Caviglione Fraga, occurred after, through various means, part of the information allegedly found on Nieto’s phone will be leaked and that different judges and prosecutors were interested in accessing messages related to cases they are investigating.
One of the magistrates who was interested in the content of Nieto’s cell phone was the federal prosecutor Gerardo Pollicita, which investigates alleged irregularities in the granting of millionaires from the Banco de la Nación Argentina to the company Vicentin during the Macri government, who has already verified that the former presidential secretary had information on his phone that could be useful for that cause.
Pollicita already confirmed the information published last Tuesday by the C5N news signal, when she announced that a note was found on Nieto’s cell phone, on November 22, 2019, which said: “Talk to Martín Mura -minister of Economy of the City- by loan to Sergio Nardelli (from Vicentin) for 10 sticks. That they do not take it to the directory or to SIGEN because they are going to complicate it, that they solve it from the outside “.
Sources from the City of Buenos Aires confirmed that, indeed, at the end of last year Mura received a request from the Presidency of the Nation linked to the possibility that Banco Ciudad granted a loan to Vicentin and that the bank itself finally refused to grant that credit after evaluating the documentation presented by the company.
In this context, Nieto’s defense demanded that the federal judge in Lomas de Zamora, Juan Pablo Auge, “let the Prosecutor’s Office involved in the proceedings be informed that, before any court or agency of the Public Ministry, request documents related to the discovery of supposed or probable evidences of interest for their investigations (which are accessed through journalistic means for illegal leaks) that it is not appropriate to grant their request. “
For the lawyer of the former presidential secretary, any request for information by a magistrate who intervenes in another file “far exceeds the motive and reason for origin” of the hijacking of Nieto’s cell phone, so its delivery “would validate that the kidnapping of the The material in question is used, no longer to corroborate if Mr. Nieto has participated in the events investigated here, but for a direct, illegitimate and illegal fishing excursion. “
Nieto’s defense assured that “There is a continuity of illegal leaks on the alleged content found on the cell” of his client “on alleged facts and circumstances unrelated to the subject of the summary that leads the Federal Prosecutor number 2 of Lomas de Zamora.” And he gives as an example the note signed by Ámbito journalist, Gabriel Morini, which was published this Friday.
Macri’s former secretary claimed “That the magistrates and assistants (both personnel of their dependency) and the security forces that intervene in the network of custody of the cell phone in question be ordered, the absolute prohibition of the diffusion and filtering of the content of what was extracted on the phone cell phone hijacked my client on June 25, 2020 at his home. “
Finally, the defense of Nieto insisted on the fact that his client filed a complaint with the federal courts of Comodoro Py “regarding the manipulation, manufacture, deformation of the content of the material found on his cell phone hijacked in cars and in custody” .
–
