Leopoldo Silva, president of the Board of Directors of the University Club, decided to open Marco García’s file after harassment accusation It was revealed this Monday. For this reason, he made the decision to suspend the midfielder indefinitely.
The manager assured that it was an issue that happened two years ago and I was not aware of this case when he took office in November 2019. However, he decided to investigate the facts as it is a matter related to gender violence.
“Today, for the note that is published in Record I learned about this event that happened just over two years ago. From this it was that we issued this statement to give the chronology of the facts of what happened, the way it acted, “he told the chain TUDN.
“Even so I have decided on this date to reopen the file of what happened and how it acted at the time, so that from this date I have decided to suspend indefinitely in his participation of the club to the young Marco García in what we draw the conclusions of the event, ”he said.
If Marco Garcia is guilty, he will be taken out of the club
Silva added that after studying the case he could reach the extreme of permanently separating Garcia from the club.
“We will reach what is necessary to arrive, reopen the file, we will analyze all the documents that are found and we will be talking with the people involved. If necessary we could reach the final separation of the player, he will not have any activity within the club, nor with the first team nor will he be present in the team games ahead of us, ”he said.
The manager said that there will be “a blunt response” in the next few days and said that because of the situation the country is experiencing, things are being done correctly.
“I have no doubt I think it acted correctly but how is it possible that after two and a half years the issue comes to light by putting them that they have acted correctly. We will do our part to clarify in a decisive way how it was resolved two and a half years ago, ”he added.
Silva added that he was already in contact with her for the case and reiterated that it was the teacher who resigned. “The resignation exists, I have it with your fingerprint, as it is in these cases.
– .
