“Korea, Japan rejects compelled labor and ‘separate issue’ to check with for return to the white country”

International Minister Hayashi – Minister Park Jin [사진 제공:연합뉴스]

-Japan’s Sankei Shimbun noted that the South Korean authorities had not long ago questioned Japan to return South Korea to the so-referred to as “white nations” listing, which is subject matter to preferential export administration, as very well as resolving the difficulty of payment for victims. of compelled labor in the course of colonial rule Japan at a conference of foreign ministers among Korea and Japan. He noted it now.

Citing many Japanese governing administration officials, Sankei said: “At the Korea-Japan foreign ministers conference held in Cambodia on the 4th of this month, South Korean International Minister Park Jin returned to the white checklist and called for the lifting of the strict regulate. on Japan’s exports a few semiconductor products have done so, “he claimed.

In this regard, Sankei stated: “Japan’s Overseas Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi dismissed the concern as” a individual challenge from the conscript problem “and continuously mentioned:” When it reaches income, it gets a really serious problem and should be averted. ‘”

Nevertheless, a South Korean foreign ministry official denied the report, saying it was “not legitimate”.

“The Korean authorities has consistently urged Japan to promptly withdraw its unfair export command steps,” the official included.

As a de facto retaliatory measure towards the South Korean Supreme Court’s ruling on payment for forced labor, Japan limited exports to Korea by 3 goods in July 2019, like hydrogen fluoride, a essential semiconductor material and exhibit, and excluded Korea from the white record in August.

Though the Japanese government has denied that the export restrictions ended up a counter-response to the conscription compensation ruling, it is sustaining the institutional shortcomings that were being employed as justification for the polices at the time, even right after Korea revised them.

It is observed that while there is also a diplomatic remedy to fix the pressured labor payment dilemma, Japan’s justification for continuing the settlement turns into even additional subtle.

In a press meeting to commemorate the 100th anniversary of its inauguration on the 17th, President Yoon Seok-yeol said, “We are now striving to locate a way for collectors to acquire payment without the need of the sovereignty conflict that the Japan”.

The upcoming day, Japan’s Asahi Shimbun analyzed in an editorial that “The transfer to relieve export restrictions might be a beneficial message that supports the coordination of the Yun Seok-yeol administration on Korea-Japan troubles in Korea.”

He also proposed to the Japanese govt: “Why don’t we start out the course of action of lifting the actions to fortify export restrictions to Korea that have been executed a few decades ago?”

The Japanese govt argues that the difficulty of compensation statements for victims of compelled labor has already been solved via the 1965 Korea-Japan Payment Settlement.

Amid the imminent conversion of assets in Korea by Japanese war felony corporations refusing to implement a compelled labor payment judgment, the Korean governing administration strategies to come across a option by collecting the views of domestic professionals by means of a council. public-non-public and speaking with victims who did not take part in the council.

–