Juve investigation, the prosecutors are asking for the indictment of 13 suspects including Andrea Agnelli

13 of the 16 suspects go to trial, including the former president Andrea Agnelliinvolved in the investigation false accounting that the Turin prosecutor hypothesizes that they were committed to reduce the large liability of the Juventus.

This morning the prosecutors Marco Gianoglio, Mario Bendoni and Ciro Santoriello sent the investigating judge the request for indictment, which follows the accusatory framework of the closure of the investigations. However, the three members of the board of statutory auditors were removed from the first list of suspects. It’s about Silvia Lirici (defended by the lawyer Marco Calleri), Nicoletta Paracchini and of the president Paul Picattiboth assisted by the lawyer Luigi Giuliano.

The three mayors – whose position will go towards the filing – had asked to be heard by the magistrates and it was in that interrogation, which took place on Friday, that they demonstrated to the prosecution that they were not involved in the disputes: in addition to false accounting, the leaders The indictments concern insider trading, obstruction of Consob supervision and false invoicing.

At the center of the investigation are capital gains considered artificial for 155 million eurosthe false news on the salary maneuver, the operating losses lower than the real ones. But other elements would have been found in recent weeks by the Guardia di Finanza, which is conducting the investigations, and it is not excluded that other disputes may soon be added to those made against the suspects on 24 October.

However, the club is convinced that it can demonstrate the correctness of the work. Yesterday the Juventus club made it clear that “on the basis of a solid set of opinions from leading legal and accounting professionals – reads an official note – the Juventus board has reached, with compactness, the unanimous conclusion by the nine directors in office on November 28, 2022, that the accounting treatment adopted in the disputed financial statements falls within those permitted by the applicable accounting standards, and the Public Prosecutor’s disputes do not appear to be founded”.