Joo Ho-young “There was a worry for prejudice, but it grew to become a actuality”
Court “The choose is not affiliated with a distinct team”
–
People’s Energy Unexpected emergency Response Committee chair Ho-Young Joo reported the choose was from a certain investigate team when he cited the court’s software for an injunction to suspend the result of non-surrogacy. The court refuted this, indicating, “This is not real.”
President Joo met with reporters at the National Assembly on the 26th and claimed about the final result of the demo: “There was problem that there would be bias and peculiar results, but that issue seems to have occur correct.” He reported: “How absurd that the courtroom determined it was not an crisis, even while the get together referred to as it an crisis. He defined that
“The bash will hold a normal conference of associates of the House of Representatives convened tomorrow (27) at 16, so we system to listen to the views of the lawyers included in this method and decide the course of the get together.”
On this day, Civil Division 51 of Seoul Southern District Court (Main Choose Hwang Jung-soo) partially upheld the injunction application filed by previous CEO Lee Jun-seok, inquiring to suspend the move to the People’s Ability Crisis Response Committee (does not happen). It is thought that if President Joo holds a national convention to elect a new occasion chief, there is a threat of irreparable harm because the previous representative are not able to return to the celebration even soon after the membership suspension time period has elapsed. to the party. Consequently, it was decided to suspend the exercising of the capabilities of President of the State until eventually the judgment on the merits turns into definitive.
Previously, in a assertion unveiled to the push soon immediately after the court’s final decision on the interim injunction, President Joo stated: “I can not comprehend today’s decision that people’s power is not an crisis.” He said: “It is really pretty uncomfortable. It undermines the constitutional spirit of bash autonomy.”
About President Joo’s remark that “the judge belongs to a distinct investigate group”, there was also the argument that he would be a part of the “Korean Regulation Investigation Modern society” or “Korean Legislation Research Culture”. intercontinental human legal rights legislation “, a team of progressive judges. In this regard, the Seoul Southern District Court claimed in a observe: “Choose Hwang is not a member of the Korean Legislation Research Affiliation or the Worldwide Human Rights Legislation Analysis Society.”
Oh Se-seong, Hankyung.com reporter [email protected]
–
