The Rise of Crypto PACs and their Influence on US Politics
Over the past year, the value of Bitcoin has witnessed a significant rebound, crossing $73,000. This surge in Bitcoin’s value has not only contributed to the popularity of cryptocurrencies but has also paved the way for the rise of a new force in US politics—the crypto PACs. With a total of at least $85 million in funds, these political action committees are making their mark by supporting candidates who are favorable to the crypto industry’s interests.
Impact on US Elections
The influence of crypto PACs is already evident in US elections. In a recent California Senate race, Rep. Katie Porter, a known critic of crypto, faced significant opposition from three PACs that spent $10 million campaigning against her. Despite this, Porter finished in third place, behind her Democrat colleague, Adam Schiff. Though PAC funding was one factor, Porter’s defeat cannot be attributed solely to the crypto PACs. However, she views the rise of these PACs as a malevolent force in US politics—what she calls “dark money” and “rigging” of the democratic process.
Clearer Regulatory Framework
The mission of one major crypto PAC, Fairshake, is to support candidates who aim to provide clearer regulatory and legal frameworks for blockchain innovators. By doing so, they aspire to protect and develop crypto networks. This approach signifies that the crypto industry seeks greater legitimacy through regulation, which can address concerns around energy consumption and environmental impact.
Champions and Beneficiaries of Crypto PACs
While PACs funding campaigns can impact the outcomes of elections, it is important to note that support for or opposition against candidates extends beyond crypto PACs. In recent House primaries, Shomari Figures and Julie Johnson, candidates who received substantial backing from crypto PACs, emerged victorious. Both candidates actively champion cryptocurrencies and embrace the potential of blockchain technology to benefit Americans.
Transparent Lobbying
The crypto industry’s support through PACs is not unique; countless industries utilize PAC funding as a means of advocating for specific policies and regulations. Critics of crypto PACs often highlight instances like Sam Bankman-Fried’s donations, where stolen funds were allegedly discovered. However, these anomalies point to a larger issue with PAC systems in general. Regulation and greater transparency are needed to ensure that donations are properly attributed and that the democratic process remains fair and just.
The Future of Crypto PACs
The increasing involvement of crypto PACs in US politics reflects the industry’s ongoing journey toward greater mainstream acceptance and influence. However, the concerns and criticisms surrounding PACs in general demand a comprehensive reevaluation of campaign finance and the need for more transparent systems. As crypto PACs make their presence felt, it remains crucial to strike a balance between regulation that protects consumers and legislative initiatives that foster innovation in the crypto space.
Chart: The Politics of Bitcoin
Quoted: Rep. Katie Porter
“Rigged means manipulated by dishonest means. A few billionaires spent $10 million+ on attack ads on me, including an ad rated “false” by an independent fact checker. That is dishonest means to manipulate an outcome. I said “rigged by billionaires” and our politics are—in fact—manipulated by big dark money. Defending democracy means calling that out.”
What Does Crypto Want?
Candidates like Julie Johnson prioritize the establishment of clear rules and regulations that benefit the crypto industry while protecting consumers and ensuring equitable outcomes. The crypto industry seeks greater legitimacy by demonstrating its commitment to compliance and transparent business practices. Policymakers are thus faced with a decision—whether to support clear regulations that provide consumer protections or not.
A Call for Reforming PACs
The concern surrounding PACs goes beyond the influence of crypto. The ability to cloak the origins of campaign funds is a systemic issue. For comprehensive campaign finance reform, addressing the issue of transparency is of paramount importance. Crypto PACs, despite their impact, are not the sole perpetrator, which highlights the need for broader reform in political funding practices.
One 💰 Thing
The case of Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder of FTX, highlights an egregious misuse of funds that affects not just crypto PACs but all PAC-funded contributions. Campaign finance regulations must be revisited to address the issue of hiding the true sources of funding, which poses a bigger challenge than just crypto-associated PACs.
Thank you for reading! If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, feel free to reach out to us. Have a great day!
— [Editor’s Name], [News Website Name]
