There was a lot of pressure on the referee Guida and on Orsato, who was Var, designated by Rocchi for Lazio-Milan, the evening postponement of Serie A. The words of the eve of Pioli, who had stirred the controversy over the mistakes suffered by his team so far , making it clear that in order to balance the wrongs and favors, his parents would have to receive gifts from here until the end of the championship, they had thrown gas on a fire – such as that related to the conduct of referees – always on. But how the whistle of Torre Annunziata got off at the Olimpico?
Sarri attacks the referee: Guide He directed one way
Bad for the Lazio coach. In the press room, after the knockout on the pitch, Sarri he said bluntly: “You saw the match too: the feeling that he was refereeing one way I got it right away “.
For Saccani Guida he arbitrated well
Saccani has the opposite opinion. The former referee, now a Rai moviolist, says to Domenica Sportiva: “Guide he played a good game, it was complicated, well played by both of them, correct but that put him to the test. Actually the decisions doubtful they gave Lazio an advantage, Sarri is wrong, he must have complained about the evaluation of the individual fouls but I have not seen any disputes, in the arc of the match Guida was also balanced in the yellow “
For Saccani it is right to warn Strakosha
Saccani starts from Milan’s first protest, which asked for Strakosha to be sent off: “at 9 ′ there is a back pass by Patrick, Strakosha misses the postponement, the ball returns to him and he catches it with his hands outside the box. Guida opts for a yellow card because for him it is not a clear goal opportunity, Messiah is not in possession of the ball and for the direction that the ball goes outwards, I feel I agree with this choice even if in the first instance the instinctive movement of Strakosha leads to asking for decisions but does not fall within the parameters that lead to expulsion “
There is no penalty for Milan according to Saccani
We then move on to the second episode: “From corner action there is a rejected by Strakosha, there is a pinball machine between Brahim Diaz and Luis Alberto: the carom ball on Luis Alberto but his arm is along the body, then he widens it but the contact with the ball has already been there, once again I agree with Guida. Undoubtedly he touches her with his arm but for me it is not a penalty. There are no other important episodes, Sarri will perhaps complain about the conduct of the match “.
Also for Marelli there is no red in Strakosha
Marelli’s opinion arrives on Dazn. On the first episode, the former referee from Como says: “Strakosha is saved from expulsion because the ball was directed outwards and Messias would then have to kick. A sensational goal was not denied, but only a sensational opportunity ”.
On the other hand, more possibilist on the second case: “The arm Luis Alberto is quite wide compared to the body, and among other things the Spaniard is looking at the ball. It is a very, very doubtful episode, on which there is ample room for discussion ”.
SPORTEVAI
–
