25 Feb ’16 – Mr. Kaew San Atipho published an article on “Report from the Criminal Court case of the DPW” via www.thaipost.net With details as follows
Q. How did the professor fall into the defendant in the NCPO case? Only do it on stage
Responding to theories of DSI and the prosecutors under political command at the time Using Mao Kheng theory Who has done as Alliance, PDRC The size of the musicians went to the alliance stage at Suvarnabhumi Still being sued to support terrorism PDRC has committed an offense Because the message made Uncle Suthep’s encouragement
Q. How did the court decide on this issue?
Answer: When the court refuses to charter the basket as filed I was only liable for my stage, so I dropped the case. As for the leaders themselves, they are responsible for different karma, only for what part they do. Even if you see the same penalty, someone is different. It is correct that the court rejected the Mao Kheng theory like this The investigator and the prosecutor please remember. Three finger mob cases You must not do this again.
Ask the teacher, do you feel that Done for the nation to expel the evil from the country Why are you in jail like this?
M: I feel very sorry for the main defendant’s friend. Personally, I am not glad that the court dismissed the lawsuit because I knew that There is nothing to punish me. I only made a speech for a reason. As for the legal idea I still believe that the case can be reversed in the appeal class. If the Appeal Court agrees with the “right to protect the Constitution of the NCPO” in the 2007 Constitution provided in Section 69 that
Section 69.A person shall have the right to oppose by peaceful means any act which is possible to obtain power to rule the country by means which is not in accordance with the course provided in this Constitution.
Asked, saw in the judgment, he accepted it, didn’t he? We are exercising our right to a peaceful assembly. And the right to protect the constitution
Answer: You start beforehand that we have the right But after that, you confirm every time you make a mistake in each counter that “The basic rights cannot be excluded from committing an illegal act.” Which makes various legal offenses It flocked into the leader and caused chaos. Obstruct elections Trespassing government office Inciting government officials to stop work, and there were two charges of treason and terrorism, which was dropped because he saw that he did not fit in the elements Not because they have the power to act according to the right to protect the constitution
Q. How do you appeal the judgment of the Criminal Court?
Answer: I have to appeal both problems.
1. Appeal that our actions do not constitute an offense. For example, entering the Ministry of Finance to persuade officials to take a break only Is not an invasion of possession, etc. Here are fighting according to the evidence.
2. Appeal that we are not guilty because we have the power to do so under section 69 to protect the constitution. We do not take the fundamental right to the exclusion of offenses as the first court understands, but we insist that we have the power to defend the Constitution. It is like using the right to defend ourselves, taking a gun and shooting a gangster who will ever stab our children. In this defense, there are no other cases like us.
What other cases are you asking?
Responding to the NACC’s case to evict the Prime Minister Abhisit government Without this right Because the Abhisit government does not harm the constitution As for the Allied case while uprising to expel Thaksin regime The threat of Thaksin’s regime is still unclear and constitutional like the PDRC case, even more in the case of the three-fingered mob. The monarchy is even more harmless.
Q. In the PDRC era, the Thaksin regime is already a mature threat?
Answer: 2 times the party was dissolved, many cases of corruption, the court punished, transferred relatives to hold important positions until the court decided to revoke the appointment order, tried to amend the constitution to hold absolute power twice, fled the case to foreign countries but sent the younger A woman becomes a puppet, illegally occupied Thai politics, is a parliamentary dictator, uses a majority of the majority to amnesty for corruption cases for herself, etc. It was clear to the PDRC that the Thaksin regime was like a cobra that had fallen into the bedroom. Must hit, must be fired When the court comes to punish us So we don’t agree How can we go wrong with torturing animals?
Ask the defense that the PDRC is chasing this cobra, right? That would be a major appeal.
A. Yes, if the High Court admits that we have this right We have the right to resist peacefully. The key weapon of peaceful resistance is strike, so it’s not wrong to invite government officials or workers to take a break. Both invading and inciting It’s not wrong to block a peaceful election. It is left to suspect that it is beyond the scope of peaceful means. Only a few krathongs Which can be punished below the law As if defending himself unreasonably That is still wrong but can reduce the penalty
Q. When will I appeal?
Answer it as soon as possible. Wait for Uncle Kamnan to get bail first
Why did Uncle Kamnan and the eight people not get insurance like the other 6 people who got insurance?
Answer this question, I really don’t understand. If it is a big case, heavy punishment such as the drug king Then the court asked for the insurance to be ordered by the High Court. So I have seen and can understand the reasons, but the Criminal Court is the primary court of the country. Uncle Kamnan is only punished for 5 years, why didn’t the Criminal Court order himself? I don’t know your reason.
Q. When will the Appeal Court order a bail request? Must wait for us to appeal the case first or
A. Do not wait. Order today two days.
Question: Someone thinks that the court is ruthless with the DPW to threaten a 3-inch case.
Answer, don’t think so. I can think of it, but there is no probability to see.
– .
