Home » today » News » Differences in the fate of Inspector General Napoleon from Pinangki and Djoko Tjandra

Differences in the fate of Inspector General Napoleon from Pinangki and Djoko Tjandra

Jakarta

The sentence for the former Head of the International Relations Division of the Indonesian National Police, Inspector General Napoleon Bonaparte (55), at the appeals level nothing has changed. His fate is different from the 2 convicts who are still a gang, namely: Djoko Tjandra and Pinangki Sirna Malasari whose punishment is circumcision.

Napoleon’s sentence was upheld on appeal. Napoleon was still found guilty of accepting bribes from Djoko S Tjandra and had to serve a sentence of 4 years in prison.

“Strengthening the Corruption Court Decision at the Central Jakarta District Court for which the appeal was requested. Ordering that the period of arrest and detention that has been served by the Defendant is reduced entirely from the length of the sentence imposed,” reads the decision of the Jakarta High Court (PT) as reported by the MA website. , Wednesday (28/7/2021).

Sitting as chairman of the assembly, Muhamad Yusuf, with members Haryono, Singgih Budi Prakoso, Rusdi and Renny Halida Ilham Malik. According to the high court, the indictment of the public prosecutor has been dated and signed by the appointed prosecutor/public prosecutor and contains the identity of the accused, a description of the criminal act accused is carefully, clearly and completely stated, stating the time and place where the crime was committed.

“Therefore, the indictment has fulfilled the formal requirements and material requirements stipulated in Article 143 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Thus, the reason for the objections of the Defendant’s Legal Counsel regarding the indictment of legal defects is not true,” said the high court.

Pinangki Prosecutor’s Sentencing Correction

Prosecutor Pinangki is a case broker aka Markus for convicts of corruption Djoko Tjandra can escape imprisonment by submitting a fatwa to the Supreme Court (MA). Pinangki often met Djoko Tjandra abroad to lobby Markus. In fact, at that time Djoko’s status was a fugitive.

But Pinangki’s business was exposed and he had to be held accountable before the law. In the indictment, a number of names of legal caretakers in this country are called Pinangki to smooth the MA Fatwa, such as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to the Attorney General.

Initially Pinangki was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but by the Jakarta High Court (PT) it was cut 60 percent, the sentence was only 4 years in prison.

“That the Defendant is a mother of her child who is still a toddler (4 years old) deserves the opportunity to care for and give love to her child during his growth period. That the Defendant as a woman must receive attention, protection, and be treated fairly,” said the chairman of the panel. Muhammad Yusuf with members Haryono, Singgih Budi Prakoso, Lafat Akbar, and Reny Halida Ilham Malik.

On Pinangki’s verdict, the public prosecutor (JPU) decided not to file an appeal. Pinangki’s attorney also decided so. Thus, the decision of PT DKI Jakarta to circumcise Pinangki’s sentence from 10 to 4 years in prison is declared to have permanent legal force or inkrah.

Read more on the next page:

See also Video: Inspector General Napoleon Rejects Judge’s Sentence: It’s Better To Die, Then Rock TikTok

[Gambas:Video 20detik]

– .

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.