In recent weeks, the Statens Serum Institut (SSI), which is the National Institute of Public Health’s sister institute in Denmark, has stepped up its efforts to spread misinformation about the corona situation in Denmark on social media.
– We are naturally concerned about the spread of incorrect information when it happens on the basis of data from SSI. Therefore, we have also actively entered into some Twitter threads to tell what the numbers look like in Denmark. It seems that we have become a piece in an American debate on reopening, but that naturally does not justify distorting or misusing our numbers, says press manager Flemming Platz at SSI to Dagbladet and continues:
– In particular, we have emphasized that omikron has changed the rules of the game and the way we should look at the infection. An increasing proportion of hospitalizations and deaths will not occur due to covid-19, even if one has a positive PCR test.
– What consequences can such dissemination of incorrect information have?
– SSI is a research and emergency preparedness institute that works on a daily basis in an international environment. It can be harmful if the misinformation casts doubt on the credibility and professionalism of the Danish health authorities, and therefore we should also react to that kind, says press officer Platz.
–
Collision
One of the clashes between SSI and Feigl-Ding took place 15 february.
– OMG. Danish politicians have completely lost their minds and removed all infection control measures against covid-19. This is exponential growth in deaths, not cases of infection! This is what happens when heads of state gaslighter their own population, Feigl-Ding wrote in a Twitter message and added the subject “CovidIsNotOver”.
Feigl-Ding referred to a graph from Our World in Data, where he compared the number of covid-19 deaths per million inhabitants in Denmark with in the world. The graph showed that the number of covid-19-associated deaths has increased sharply in Denmark in recent months, but SSI had an important clarification:
– Dear Eric. Once again, we want to emphasize that the numbers you share with your followers show the number of deaths with covid-19, not the number of deaths due to covid-19, SSI responded in a Twitter message, referring to its own weekly report for more information.
The Danes have also created one information page where they refute common misconceptions about the corona situation in Denmark.
–
The situation in Norway
Director Frode Forland at the National Institute of Public Health tells Dagbladet that they have observed the Twitter debate. Forland has noticed that it is especially about American professionals and Twitter users who seem to be surprised, and criticizes Denmark for having removed the corona measures at the same time as the infection rates are high.
– We have also looked at SSI’s answers online, and think it is good, says Forland to Dagbladet.
– We have not observed the same criticism of Norway on Twitter, but it may of course have come without us being tagged or having seen it. We are somewhat behind Denmark in the course of the pandemic, so criticism can come and we will follow.
Forland says that NIPH discusses this regularly in meetings with the Nordic public health institutes. He also says that FHI has prioritized editor-controlled media and Facebook over Twitter because they believe that they meet the most people in that way.
– We constantly assess whether there is a need to go out and clarify misunderstandings and dispel myths.
–
– Tongue straight in the mouth
Assistant health director Espen Rostrup Nakstad encourages to keep your tongue straight in your mouth.
– In this pandemic, there has been an incredible amount of information and discussion about everything possible, and a lot that has turned out not to be true. So my best tip is to make use of the reliable sources. If you want to know something about the situation in Denmark, for example, you can go to SSI’s website.
– There are many who speculate on things, and it may happen that a study is overinterpreted, and that it means that it appears as an established truth in an online community. So you have to have your tongue straight in your mouth, and be critical of sources, as you do when you read news otherwise.