We publish the letter from Cristina Seymandi who brings some clarifications to the latest events on the breaking of the engagement with Massimo Segre. In particular, on the 700 thousand euros that would have been withdrawn from the common account and on his company.
Many things have been said in recent weeks, often inaccurate, also due to the word of mouth of information in hurried and chaotic journalistic circles; these statements have generated some misunderstandings.
Among these things, there is an alleged phone call from Pier Silvio Berlusconi who allegedly called me personally to invite me to participate in Big Brother Vip: I smile but I don’t waste words, I would be very flattered by a direct call from the CEO of Mediaset, but I can guarantee that it never happened.
The disinformation and delegitimization campaign launched against me has even involved the company in which I am the majority shareholder, Savio, an important Piedmontese company leader in its sector, with 134 years of history and 150 valid employees, with which I sincerely apologize: Savio is a financially sound company, and with orders such as to guarantee its full survival even after the epochal Segre/Seymandi “quarrel”, which has kept the mass media busy in recent weeks. I’m sorry if any of the company’s employees have become worried in the last few days, but again it wasn’t my fault, and in any case there is no cause for concern.
On the famous engagement ring: there are those who have “read” in my words an accusation against Massimo Segre of having taken it back at his disposal. But among the many faults I have, there is no lack of frankness, and if I had wanted to accuse Massimo of having appropriated the ring, I would have blatantly said so. I was clear: that ring disappeared 15 days before that cursed evening of July 27, and it’s true; I didn’t lose or take it, and it’s true (also because from that evening I was no longer allowed to enter the house where I lived with Massimo, and I had to call in the police to accompany me and allow me to recover my personal belongings ); therefore, someone must have taken it, that’s for sure. Having said that, whoever appropriates it – damaging both me, because I was very fond of that object, and Massimo, because for him it was a dear family memory – will come to terms with their own conscience.
My statement “from which pulpit does the sermon come from”, referring to the betrayals – real or presumed – by Maximus in the past, is another issue that kept the reporters very busy: I have no proof that Maximus betrayed me, however I confirm that Massimo confided in me that he too had made mistakes in his previous relationships. I wonder then, indeed, I ask him: would he have liked it if his companions had given him the exact same treatment that he reserved for me…? Maximus should have clearly understood the meaning of the phrase taken from the Gospel according to John «He who is without sin cast the first stone». Whatever my mistakes – real or presumed – have been in my life as a couple, I would have expected not a humiliating staging like the one I was forced to witness on that sultry late July evening, but rather a frank confrontation and directed within our couple. The wedding had not yet been celebrated, even in the event of irreconcilable differences our paths could possibly have divided without causing all this pain. As I have already had the opportunity to say, I do not consider myself judge and executioner of anyone, and I cannot applaud anyone who examines a case, issues a sentence and executes it in public, without even an attempt to contradict and without leaving room for discussion and discussion. some explanations.
Another theme: the mass media wrote that I would have appropriated 700,000 euros owned by Massimo, without his knowledge. Again a sensational hoax, invented by those who “whisper” in the ear of the newspapers with the aim of discord and throw fuel on a fire already quite lit and hot. That money transfer was 5 months old, therefore much earlier than our separation, made striking by Massimo’s choice to celebrate it in public, and it was a money transfer expressly authorized by Massimo himself, part of movements of a patrimonial nature within the our couple, linked as everyone by now knows you know both from an emotional and from an entrepreneurial point of view. Has Massimo now changed his mind and wants them back? We are discussing it in the Court these days, but – again – not by my will, because once again it was Massimo who deemed it appropriate – perhaps again badly advised – to summon me to the Court for this, when perhaps even this patrimonial aspect could have be discussed in other tones and in other forums.
Basically, in the last month I’ve been transformed in a rather violent way into a spectator of my own life: some do things, some say things, some shout things, some say bluntly things certainty… and I can only listen, take note, and patiently deny, correct, rectify, all activities that are keeping me busy almost full-time even during my vacation, in which I only wanted to dedicate my heart and soul to my daughter , innocent victim of all this noise.
2023-08-24 06:19:00
#Cristina #Seymandi #police #needed #recover #house #lived #Massimo
