BEFORE THE ACCIDENT: Geir Kåre Cemsoylu Nyland, here photographed in 2016. Photo: Annemor Larsen / VG
––
– Signed up
Richard Kongsteien, communications director at the urban environment agency, tells VG that immediately after the accident they had an inspection with the developer.
– Then we discovered areas where there was too much distance between the signs, and it was immediately signposted, he says.
– Shouldn’t there be signs at face height?
– The question of divorce is a dilemma. It is very difficult to stand away from risk in a city. What we are working on now is to find a solution that to a much greater extent intuitively signals that here you must not jump into the water, says Kongsteien and adds that the professionals agree that the solution is no longer a sign.
Some of the alternatives the municipality is considering are colors, lights, fences and planting, but they have not concluded.
– How about setting up a fence?
– It is not a good alternative. We must constantly balance between accessibility to the fjord and safety. The downside of fencing in is if it means people think you can dive from all areas that are not fenced in. Then we have to fence in an awful lot. Our main message is that diving in the center of Oslo is very risky. Before doing so, you must be absolutely sure of the bottom conditions. We can not part with it.
Kongsteien understands Uusimaa’s frustration and anger after the tragic accident.
He confirms that the municipality, as far as he knows, has not contacted Uusimaa.
–
Related