“The progress of any project can be easily judged by the dynamics of the allocated budget utilization. In the ProZorro system, it is very clearly visible budget list for the construction of an airfield in the Dnieper, it is enough to study the corresponding applications. It is already clear today that the construction schedule has been disrupted, and the pace of work is alarmingly low. In 2021, they should master UAH 1.4 billion. Yesterday I read that UAH 5.8 million was spent in March instead of UAH 8.5 million planned. That is, they did not fit the required 2,950 cubic meters and 64 running meters, they did not build 1 stage of 4 temporary structures, “the expert noted.
On average, UAH 155 million should be spent on the construction of an airport in Dnipro per month, which are distributed in different proportions over the months.
“If every month there is a 30% lag behind the schedule, as it is now, then the flaw will be superimposed on the flaw. It’s not a simple and not a linear process. Problems will snowball, and as a result, Dnipro will receive an airport in 10 years or even 20.” , – the expert adds.
He also added that the future of the new airport in Dnipro is also under threat due to the fact that the results of the tender for its construction did not pass the industry expertise.
“Initially, the total amount requested by the contractor itself raises serious doubts. It is 30% lower than the starting one, which suggests dumping, which ultimately leads to uncontrolled pumping of public money. They will come up with reasons and milk the budget, or what else worse, to build at random. Is it possible to create a modern safe airfield for 3, 95 billion UAH instead of 5.69 billion UAH or not? ProZorro public procurement site with its purely price selection criteria or general specialists of the Ministry of Economy and the Ministry of Finance, by definition, cannot in this to figure it out without experts in the field of airport construction! Without specialists who know the technological nuances and understand the pricing environment of the resource markets for construction. And they were not attracted. And if the state continues to go blindly, give carte blanche to a private trader who is only interested in profit, this will lead to a catastrophe, disruption of construction and disappointed expectations, “he summed up.
– .
