Home » today » News » Why the mortality of the epidemic is difficult to calculate … for now

Why the mortality of the epidemic is difficult to calculate … for now

The severity of Covid-19, illustrated by the mortality from the disease, remains undefined. Variable from one country to another, it also fluctuates according to death, healing and methodological choices. The term “mortality” alone can mean several different quantities. Why is it so difficult to come up with a figure that is apparently easy to calculate? The notion of mortality vaguely refers to people who die, of course, but in relation to what? Stricto sensu, the “death rate” is the number of Covid-19 deaths divided by the general population considered (that of a city or a country for example).

We can also divide the number of victims by the number of clinically confirmed cases: this is what is currently used in national reports and those of the World Health Organization (WHO) and which should logically be called ” case fatality rate “, except that the same term” mortality “is also used. In English, this is called “case fatality rate“(CFR).

Also read:
Confusion over death toll

So, should we review the vocabulary? “It is not so important,” said Antoine Flahault, director of the Institute of Global Health at the University of Geneva. The term “mortality” is more easily understood and remains precise, at least as long as it is clarified what it relates to: general population, confirmed cases (symptomatic) or even infected people (symptomatic and asymptomatic). “

Find
news from April 16

Important bias

These calculations allow us to approach the epidemic differently. The case fatality rate is undoubtedly the easiest and quickest to calculate in the midst of an epidemic. It provides a snapshot of the situation, with important limitations. Imagine 100 people diagnosed with coronavirus and two of whom die the next day. The CFR or case fatality rate is then 2%. But at the time of the calculation, nothing guarantees the future fate of the 98 survivors: will they cure definitively or will some of them finally die, which will weigh down the balance sheet? In other words, the case fatality rate often underestimates the actual severity of an epidemic disease.

Of all the figures, it is the excess mortality that we will retain

Antoine Flahault, University of Geneva

A more interesting variant of the calculation consists of no longer including the only clinically confirmed cases, but all of the cases considered as infectious, the confirmed but also the asymptomatic, those not declared or even diagnosed without supporting tests, for example via epidemiological investigations. This is the “death rate from infection” or “fatality rate infection(IFR), but usage is more apt to use the term mortality, which is confusing. The IFR gives a more general idea of ​​the severity of the disease, but suspected cases are also estimated with questionable accuracy, which is an important source of bias.

The scientific point on the coronavirus


The Diamond Princess experience

Many attempts to calculate the Covid-19 IFR have been made. There are as many as there are epidemiologists. One of the first serious studies on the subject was to extrapolate data from the epidemic that occurred on board the Diamond Princess liner, almost all of which were detected on board during its quarantine in Japan. This situation in a vacuum is ideal compared to measurements on the continent, where testing focuses on cases presenting to the hospital.

Also read:
Diamond Princess, coronavirus culture broth

Epidemiologists from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine have estimated 18% the proportion of infected and asymptomatic people, according to published results in the review Eurosurveillance. This was reflected after adjustments by an IFR of 1.2% which, extrapolated to China and excluding in particular the biases linked to the advanced age of cruise passengers, was around 0.5%. But estimates from other teams go up to 3% for European countries.

How to permanently place the cursor? Two possibilities: either test the population on a very large scale, which could be the case in the coming weeks as part of the deconfinement measures. Or rely on another measure, that of excess mortality recorded since the arrival of the virus. “This is the figure that we will retain, assures Antoine Flahault, because it is the only one to accurately reflect the impact of the epidemic on the population in terms of mortality.” The first figures are beginning to fall in Switzerland: in the first week of April, the number of elderly seniors was 43% higher than the mortality in previous years, according to the Federal Office for Statistics.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.