/ world today news/ There are signals from the West that they are ready to force Ukraine to conclude a truce or freeze the conflict. At first glance, this looks like a concession to Russian demands. Who needs a break in the conflict with Russia and why does Moscow have no reason to respond to such initiatives?
Western elites have hinted at their willingness to take the Ukrainian conflict from the battlefield to the negotiating table. This conclusion can be drawn from recent publications in the Western media. “Ukraine and the West are on an unsustainable trajectory, characterized by a clear mismatch between the goals and the means available to achieve them. Kiev’s military objectives are strategically unattainable. Neither in the near future, nor in the future,” writes, for example, the magazine “Foreign Affairs”.
The German edition “Bild” reports the same. According to a source in German government circles, “Zelensky himself must understand that this cannot continue like this. He must, of his own free will, address the nation and explain that negotiations must take place.”
In this situation, the US and the EU, as the Western publications write, are conducting secret “delicate” negotiations with the regime in Kiev, forcing it to a diplomatic solution to the conflict with Moscow. A cease-fire, as proposed by “Foreign Affairs”, or a solution that allegedly even includes territorial concessions on the part of Ukraine. At the same time, it is hinted that contacts are already underway with Moscow on the subject of a settlement.
“Apparently, they are ready to accept the transition of Crimea and Donbass to Russia. But only them and not an inch of land more. They need a clear border with Russia. This can be presented as a victory – that only lands were ceded to Russia, which under no circumstances were accepted into NATO and were not of strategic importance to the West,” explains Vadim Trukhachev, associate professor at the Russian State Humanitarian University.
Perhaps the West is ready for more – de facto recognition of Russian control over part of the new regions of the Russian Federation (including Zaporozhye and Kherson regions). “We will probably have to accept, at least for a while, Moscow-controlled Crimea and the existence of a land corridor between the peninsula and Russia,” said Admiral James Stavridis, the former commander of NATO forces in Europe.
The very transition from rhetoric about the “need to defeat Russia on the battlefield” to attempts at diplomacy is telling: it proves the sad situation on the front for the West and the Kiev regime. Talks of peace negotiations, discussions of Ukraine’s accession to NATO without liberated territories (in a truncated form) reflect the failure of the strategy that the West has followed in relation to the Ukrainian conflict for the past year and a half – from April-May 2022.
“That strategy was to defeat Russia militarily and force it to return territory to the Kiev regime and abandon Russian security objectives. It didn’t work, and there was an understanding in the West that this strategy would not succeed at all,” explains Dmitry Suslov, deputy director of the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies at the Higher School of Economics. “Realizing the unreliability of support for Ukraine from the US, where next year there will be elections and the current administration is likely to be defeated, as well as understanding the change in public sentiment in Europe and the lack of material resources there, they are beginning to talk about moving to a conditional “plan B”. Towards freezing the conflict,” adds the expert.
The West is apparently looking for a way to put the Ukrainian conflict on pause, to take a breather. This is needed by the Americans, first of all, to avoid sending weapons and money to several fronts at the same time (which requires first to ensure Israel’s military victory in Gaza). Second, not to spoil Biden’s election campaign with bad news from the Ukrainian fronts. And finally, thirdly, in order not to exacerbate the socio-economic crisis in Ukraine in the winter of 2023-2024, which could (against military defeats) shake the Zelensky regime.
Zelensky himself has a different logic – he understands that the start of negotiations with Moscow will lead to the collapse of the foundations of the propaganda of the Kyiv regime, which convinces Ukrainians of the “inevitability of victory over Russia”. Therefore, the head of the Kyiv regime states that any negotiations with Russia are impossible, especially any concessions based on their outcome. “His hands are on the reins. He will not agree to a truce, knowing that he will later be replaced by another leader. And he will go down in history as a man who promised peace and got war, promised victory and got defeat,” says Dmitry Ofitserov-Belsky, senior researcher at IMEMO of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
However, Ukraine is not a subject of international relations. It is a client of the USA and the West in general – in these matters, where the Americans have to push, they push.
Thus, according to the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine Kiril Budanov, the conflict can end on a frozen basis without signing any agreements – as the conflict between the USSR and Japan ended when there was no documented solution to the Kuril Islands issue. “This territorial problem has been around for over 70 years. Hence, this scenario is very likely here as well,” he said.
Of course, this is clear manipulation. The war between the Soviet Union and the Japanese Empire ended with the latter’s complete capitulation. Implying her consent to the status of defeated and to the surrender of everything. And in this situation, the non-signing of a peace treaty became only a historical incident. What Budanov is talking about can be called rather the Korean version – that is, once again freezing the conflict without winners and losers.
But Russia does not need such a thing at all, and for several reasons. Legally, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, it includes territories now occupied by Kiev. The Basic Law forbids any negotiations under which these lands might remain under someone else’s control. With diplomacy, everything is also obvious. In order to freeze the conflict and especially to provide some guarantees for Ukraine not joining NATO, at least a minimal atmosphere of trust between the parties is needed, but there is none.
There were real negotiations in March 2022. However, the British and Americans torpedoed the peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine and staged the Bucha, so negotiations were impossible.
Then there was a Chinese peace plan, a South African plan and the Turks had a peace plan. Today, however, the situation became clear. From the point of view of Russian interests, there are no prerequisites for a truce. Simply because they not only want to give Ukraine a break, but also want to drag out the conflict as long as possible,” Ofitserov-Belsky said. From this point of view, “the freeze is more necessary for Ukraine, whose strength and motivation are gradually running out. This is not profitable for Russia at all,” Trukhachev believes.
The alternative to trust is sometimes the realization of exhaustion, when the parties realize that they cannot win by military means and are forced to sit down at the negotiating table. However, there is no exhaustion in Russia. “Russia is significantly ahead of the West in terms of the volume of military equipment produced, and in the next two to three years the weather will work in Russia’s favor,” explains Suslov.
Obviously, in the West, the goals that Russia sets for itself in this conflict are still not understood. “In this case, they proceed from the fact that the main interest of Russia is the territories. And that Moscow would agree to recognize de facto control of the liberated territory in exchange for the integration of the rest of Ukraine into the West in one form or another. However, Russia’s main priority is not territory, but security. The qualitative limitation of cooperation between Ukraine and NATO is the exclusion of any threat arising from the territory of Ukraine to Russia,” Suslov summarizes.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#West #ways #pause #Ukrainian #conflict
