Zoom in / An illustration of a candidate W boson decaying into a muon and a neutrino from a proton-proton collision, recorded by the ATLAS Large Hadron Collider detector in 2018. –
Atlas/CERN Collaboration
That Standard Model of Particle Physics It has withstood rigorous tests after decades of testing, and Finding the Higgs boson In 2012 it provided the final piece of the observational puzzle. But that doesn’t stop physicists from constantly searching for new physics beyond the predictions of models. In fact, we know that the model must be incomplete because it does not include gravity and does not explain the existence of dark matter in the universe. Nor can it explain the accelerated rate of expansion of the universe, which many physicists attribute to dark energy.
The latest clue as to how the Standard Model might need to be revised comes from new accurate measurements of the W boson by the Fermilab CDF II collaboration. This measurement yielded a statistically significant higher mass for the W boson than the standard model predicted—within seven standard deviations, according to new paper Published in the journal Science. This also contradicts previous precision measurements of the mass of the W boson.
“The very high mass value of the W boson reported by the CDF Collaboration directly challenges a fundamental element at the heart of the Standard Model, where experimental observations and theoretical predictions are thought to be well established and well understood,” he and Martin wrote at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Mulders (CERN) an accompanying perspective. “This discovery… offers an exciting new perspective on current understanding of the fundamental structure of matter and forces in the universe.”
Because of this, physicists have been here before: baffled by exciting new physics clues only to have their hopes dashed as more evidence emerges. An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence, and this is certainly an extraordinary claim. “If this is true, it matters because the Standard Model would be wrong,” Clifford Cheung, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology, told Ars. “But the disagreements that appear in the trial require extreme caution.”