Are we faced with a government that takes responsibility for its decisions and does it tend to want to bear the responsibility, no matter what, on citizens? Better (or worse) yet, they are now invited to choose between two options that are equal in terms of disastrous consequences.
Minister Amzazi made all parents of students government spokespersons. How? ‘Or’ What ? Since Saturday evening August 22, 2020, at the beginning of the evening more precisely, they analyze, contradict, contradict each other, argue, counter-argue … It is not their job. Certainly. But it became because Mr. Amzazi threw them a Chinese puzzle.
Accused several times of making rash and immature decisions, the government decides not to take any more. A half-fig, half-grape decision is not a decision. It’s more of a quiz. Except that Mr. Amzazi did not specify who among the students whose parents will choose face-to-face or remote will win the prize. It’s up to you, dear parents! But assume! Run the risk of coronavirus or mediocrity. Assume and proceed to checkout. You will end up paying. The private education lobby knows how to negotiate. And when we say negotiate, it means that the two parties agree. The third parties, the parents of the students and by extension the students get along, are therefore informed of the outcome of the negotiations in which they are not a party.
And then there is the way. An original lesson in communication. Why do we publish these nocturnal press releases on a Friday or Saturday evening? To talk about it during the weekend, to trivialize the impact and blur the virulent reactions. Wait for reactions to make it a chosen and targeted output, through social media interposed (avoiding the press at all costs), in order to try to respond. Let us come to the answer by way of argument.
The Minister explains that half can choose face-to-face while the other will opt for distance education. It is the very embodiment of social injustice. Of iniquity. Distance education studies have come to the conclusion that this method is a fiasco. The deduction goes without saying.
And then how the government, after the royal speech and having regard to the countless government declarations making them take full responsibility for the spread of the virus, gives the choice, for once!, To the citizens to decide on an issue where the risk is patent? Unless the government has guarantees. He certainly does not. Otherwise he would not have postponed sine die the date of the first year Bac exams.
In this case, Minister Amzazi throws pupils and students into the mouth of the wolf. It is a totally reprehensible act and which denotes an unconsciousness. This is irrefutable proof that the government is partly responsible for the current situation and that it has mismanaged the situation through unreasonable decisions.
–
