Home » today » Entertainment » the former partner is demanding compensation from her

the former partner is demanding compensation from her

Anna Partner is in big trouble. Her ex-partner wants a gigantic compensation from her. What was it about and how does the TVP star react to it?

Anna Popek has been working on television for years. She started her professional career in front of local cameras TVP Katowice. She later joined the cast of the channel TVP1. She ran the morning program for a while Coffee or tea? Journalist impresses with a slim figurewhich is the result of, among others a junk food-free diet.

Well, a meal like this will be just a memory for a while. Daniel’s Post today, at least for a while. In addition, exercise, swimming, walking and prayer. So adio pizza and other temptations! But the game is worth its stake, she reported some time ago.

This does not mean, however, that Popek is popularly liked. She has a number of critics who do not like the fact that she continues to work on public television. In December, she was heavily criticized for posting a video on TikTokon which she carelessly danced to the rhythm of the song Because there is sex in me Kalina Jędrusik. Some recipients found it at least frivolous.

  • Jacek Kurski likes this.

  • Mrs. Popek Kurski’s pet!

  • What about a Catholic president who is divorced from the church? – Internet users wrote under the video.

video/7032522589629107461" data-video-id="7032522589629107461" style="max-width: 605px;min-width: 325px;">
@annapopektvstar

♬ original sound – Anna Popek

This time Popek has even bigger problems. All thanks to the former partner demanding a lot of compensation from her.

The former partner is demanding compensation from Anna Popek. What is the amount?

In 2020 there was a lot of media coverage of Anna Popek’s breakup with a photographer younger than her Tomasz Krupa.

She was just lucky with 41-year-old photographer Mr. Tomasz. Now she confesses that the relationship is over. And no one new appeared in her life. He explains that he does not want to get involved until he meets someone whom he knows will be able to stand on the wedding carpet with him, informed the magazine “Świat & People”.

Popek reacted to the news. She issued a lengthy statement in which she explained that she has nothing to do with her ex-partner anymore.

Beloved, I don’t usually comment on my personal matters, especially those related to my feelings. Today, however, I have to refer to publications on several portals. I want to confirm the fact that the described relationship is in the past. As my friend maliciously commented on this situation, it was a late youth mistake. Well, it does happen sometimes. However, due to the fact that I hear that this person refers to the still current contacts with me, I declare that neither privately, nor professionally, nor socially, I have nothing in common with Mr. Tomasz. It will be an abuse to refer to me. However, I believe that this will not be the case in the future. Everyone is a blacksmith of their own fate and in this spirit we should treat the experiences that life brings us – she said on Instagram.

The extensive entry does not end the matter. Super Express he found out that Krupa was demanding 300,000 zlotys from her.

Anna owes me 300 thousand. zloty. Most of all, she slandered me when we broke up. She broke my relationship with the girl I later dated, but most of all because of her I lost my contract on TV. She made jokes. We recorded four episodes, and she did not come to the fifth one, because she said that she had a sick heart, and she did not provide a certificate – the photographer told the tabloid.

Then he completed:

Just 110 thousand. it is a compensation for moral damages in connection with slandering me in press interviews that he was supposed to refer to her for my own benefit. […] I am ashamed now that I was with her … I had a management contract with her, for which she did not pay me because she said she would not pay me money.

He also announced that he would take the case to the prosecutor’s office, because he had everything documented. How did the journalist react to this? In an interview with “SE” she declined to comment.

All indications are that the case will end in court.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.