The Core i5-12400 slightly outperforms the Ryzen 5 5600X in CPU-Z and CineBench R20

The Core i5-12400 is interesting mainly in that it has all Atoms turned off. It runs on six large cores (and twelve threads) powered by architecture Golden Cove. Purely theoretically, such a product could have active support for the AVX-512, as it will not be bound by small cores, but there is no information to suggest such a thing, so it will be more reasonable to expect it to remain off for generations. Alder Lake. To perform:

CineBench R20

graph-3

The Core i5-12400 slightly (less than 5%) outperforms the Ryzen 5 5600X. However, it remains a hair below 65W octopers Zen 2 as Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 7 4700G.

graph-4

In a single-core load, the Core i5-12400 performs well as expected. We can easily calculate the IPC difference here: The Core i5 is 9.1% faster and Ryzen runs 4.5% faster. IPC Alder Lake is 14.1% higher than IPC in this configuration Zen 3.

CPU-Z

graph-9

In CPU-Z, the Core i5-12400 is 3.5% faster than the Ryzen 5 5600X. Zen 2/3 65W octopuses remain relatively high above it.

graph-10

As for the IPC in CPU-Z, when comparing the results, the Core i5-12400 is 10.9% higher than the Ryzen 5 5600X. It’s quite interesting, because in previous generations, Intel has done more in CPU-Z than in CineBench. Now the situation has changed slightly, so it is possible that Intel will take CineBench back at his mercy. Maybe he already took it, because the first power leaks that could have come from Intel were the results of the CineBench R20.

–