:strip_exif()/i/2004607630.jpeg?fit=%2C&ssl=1)
Except that in every video a plate of consumption is not the maritime version. It therefore appears that Musk is trying to calculate the maximum here, while the reality is probably much lower and indeed in the direction of 150 million. What’s better, these are “selling costs”, not actual costs, obviously they’re not earning anything right now, but it’s not like Ukraine is wasting $ 150 million on data, so it’s just lost revenue. for Musk.
Missed revenue for SpaceX. And after all, even if it would be 100 million / year. Shouldn’t it be paid by Ukraine or another country? Does a company or a private individual have to donate it?
Also, the current dishes have already been paid for by the US, so at the moment Musk is just “donating” data and would like those paid for as well.
According to the source’s article, the US didn’t just pay for it
[…]According to SpaceX data shared with the Pentagon, about 85% of the 20,000 terminals in Ukraine have been paid for – or partially paid for – by countries such as the United States and Poland or other entities.[…]
And now the question: why should a company donate the remaining 15%? Not to mention 70% of the subscription cost?
[…]
But as everyone knows by now, Musk is Pro Russia and Pro China …
ah on that bike .. The fact that he fell in love with some Russian propaganda immediately makes him pro-Russian .. Let’s forget he didn’t befriend Russia with SpaceX by rigging a direct competitor and offering Ukraine’s Starlink service provided (they couldn’t have done that, huh). The best man has been threatened with death several times by Russia, but all of a sudden he is pro-Russian, while he is doing more to thwart Russia in this war than many of our Dutch companies. You can say what you want about him, because he made some very questionable business, but pro-Russian … man …
Will we leave the pro-china for a while, or will you portray all the companies doing business in China as pro-china? What a level.
